- Messages
- 2,659
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Right, I completely c***ed up an indoor flash session last night :bang:
Picture the scenario: Fairly well lit small club environment with band on a stage, but too dark for using no flash (unless using a high-iso film and / or very big aperture lens). So I brought along my Bronica SQ-A loaded with Neopan 400 film, 150mm lens set mostly to f/8 and shutter speed set to 1/125. My flash was a Canon 430EX and set to manual with half power. The camera was triggering the flash on every shot, so I assumed there was no problem. I wasn't metering because to be honest I have no idea how to meter this situation :shrug:
So, I run 2 films through during the band's performance and get home to develop it. The film comes out completely see-through. F*** I think - what the hell went wrong. This is a case of gross under-exposure, no? What should I have done, where did I go wrong and what should I do next time?
Perhaps I was standing too far back in some shots for the flash to have any effect, but some of the shots I took were close up and the flash should have been giving the poor lead singer radiation burns from the brightness! I'm thinking that there may be something wrong with the shutter speed and the bronnie triggering the flash a few milliseconds off, like after the shutter actually closed, but how do I test this?
I think I may do some experimentation tonight at different shutter speeds and flash power to see what happens... should have done this before the gig, though. OK, the gig wasn't paying and I was doing it for some experience in this sort of environment, but still - all shots underexposed. I must have made a right, royal f*** up :bang:
Picture the scenario: Fairly well lit small club environment with band on a stage, but too dark for using no flash (unless using a high-iso film and / or very big aperture lens). So I brought along my Bronica SQ-A loaded with Neopan 400 film, 150mm lens set mostly to f/8 and shutter speed set to 1/125. My flash was a Canon 430EX and set to manual with half power. The camera was triggering the flash on every shot, so I assumed there was no problem. I wasn't metering because to be honest I have no idea how to meter this situation :shrug:
So, I run 2 films through during the band's performance and get home to develop it. The film comes out completely see-through. F*** I think - what the hell went wrong. This is a case of gross under-exposure, no? What should I have done, where did I go wrong and what should I do next time?
Perhaps I was standing too far back in some shots for the flash to have any effect, but some of the shots I took were close up and the flash should have been giving the poor lead singer radiation burns from the brightness! I'm thinking that there may be something wrong with the shutter speed and the bronnie triggering the flash a few milliseconds off, like after the shutter actually closed, but how do I test this?
I think I may do some experimentation tonight at different shutter speeds and flash power to see what happens... should have done this before the gig, though. OK, the gig wasn't paying and I was doing it for some experience in this sort of environment, but still - all shots underexposed. I must have made a right, royal f*** up :bang: