Hi all. I have a 17-85mm lens ( as the title says .. ) and im going to use it tomorrow for5 a wedding shoot... thing is on a previous post i made, someone told me that it will get allot of barrel distortion. So any way, i went to my front door there and took a couple of pics of a lamppost which is about 30 meters away and it dosnt look lik it is leaning over although there is a little distortion. What im asking is, should i use the lens or should i stick to my 18-55 lens for the most part?
Any advice would be good. Also i was thinking about selling my 10-20 sigma and getting a new lens specifically for weddings.. any recommendations? I am looking for an L series lens - someone said to get a 70-200 but isnt that a bit long? When i was using my 18-55 lens at the last wedding i was enjoying getting in close to the people ... surly the 70-200 will be too close for comfort?
ill find out tomorrow i suppose
btw i have a 50mm prime 1.8 and im thinking i need a 17-50mm f2.8 to go along with it but i dont want a tamron becasue according to what i have read about them they are pretty crappy.
It would seem according to what people are saying that it is like being a super model with size 0 - if i can get a lens that is size zero (f/0) then im laughing (this will obviously never happen) .. is this just obsession or is it a valid point? Am I a great photographer simply because i have a supper fstoppped to the max lens? what about composition? and what about the people in the photo?
Some one said to me in my last post which i totally agree with that you can have the best gear in the world but you still need to know how to take the photo.
Lens advice please!! :bonk::bonk::bonk::bonk::bang::bang::bang:
btw i can probably muster up about £500 for a lens (this will include selling my 10-20 and some kelly from my paypal account)
Any advice would be good. Also i was thinking about selling my 10-20 sigma and getting a new lens specifically for weddings.. any recommendations? I am looking for an L series lens - someone said to get a 70-200 but isnt that a bit long? When i was using my 18-55 lens at the last wedding i was enjoying getting in close to the people ... surly the 70-200 will be too close for comfort?
ill find out tomorrow i suppose
btw i have a 50mm prime 1.8 and im thinking i need a 17-50mm f2.8 to go along with it but i dont want a tamron becasue according to what i have read about them they are pretty crappy.
It would seem according to what people are saying that it is like being a super model with size 0 - if i can get a lens that is size zero (f/0) then im laughing (this will obviously never happen) .. is this just obsession or is it a valid point? Am I a great photographer simply because i have a supper fstoppped to the max lens? what about composition? and what about the people in the photo?
Some one said to me in my last post which i totally agree with that you can have the best gear in the world but you still need to know how to take the photo.
Lens advice please!! :bonk::bonk::bonk::bonk::bang::bang::bang:
btw i can probably muster up about £500 for a lens (this will include selling my 10-20 and some kelly from my paypal account)