I am not trying to get into an argument or anything, I am not saying digital gives better results or anything. Just my thoughts are, if I had of used a digital camera to take the following photos, I would have been able to get better results. I know you should get the correct exposure at point of taking the photo, and not fix things later. But I am only taking photos for myself, and for my own memories, I am not trying to impress anybody else with my photos.
View attachment 267320
(Above) Took on the Nikon F60 over ten years ago. Had this been on digital, upping the ISO and altering the white balance, would have given a better image. Yes a better composition would have given an even better photo.
View attachment 267321
(Above) Took on the Nikon F60 a few years ago. Before anyone says it, yes it is a c**p photo, badly composed. Had it been digital, I could have worked on the highlights and shadows. Most photos just show the Cathedral, but I wanted to get the Cathedral from where I was standing, and with the buildings in the foreground. The photo was for me only, and for my memories. The place has changed a lot, since I remember it as a kid.
View attachment 267322
(Above) Taken with the Nikon F60 a few years ago. Again before anyone says anything, I know the composition is poop. But I took it at that angle because we have some from a similar angle, taken when I was a child, obviously taken by my mum. I just wanted to compare how things have changed. Had it of been digital I could have toned down the highlights, and brought out the shadows on the left.
I am not saying digital is better, I love film photos, and there are lots of film photos that are masterpieces out there. Just I am not trying to create anything special, just photos that help with my memories.
I can't recall what lens I used, I don't know what time I took them. No exif.
I hope I have not upset anyone, with my a*sing about, with thinking of trying film again.