Well, it would depend on which UWA it is and whether it distorts at the wide end etc, but I would say a shot with a wide mountain range - rather than taking an UWA shot and making them look like molehills, a series of stitched shots may provide a more zoomed but wide and more detailed image without the need for major cropping.
If that makes any sense at all.
I like using UWA's for sunsets and waterscapes.
a series of stitched shots may provide a more zoomed but wide and more detailed image without the need for major cropping.
I like using UWA's for sunsets and waterscapes.
The mountains are going to look more or less the same surely if you're shooting from the same position?
The mountains are going to look more or less the same surely if you're shooting from the same position?
This panorama ended up 20000 pixels wide
5D3_9270_9276_stitch_1500-2_1500 by David Williams, on Flickr
They probably would but I guess that a panorama is going to be so much more detailed?
What limitations though? Not arguing, simply looking into the 2 different methods and wondering if its worth me getting another UWA or not ?