Are you missing out on contracts/roles because you don't have the certificate or because you don't have the skills delivered by the training? I work for a global organisation who primarily use Hyper-V over VMWare but certificates are often seen as no more than a CV boost if the engineer hasn't got actual real-world experience.
Experience > certs
I know people that guessed their way through a lot of their exams.
Isn't the point being made that experience and ability is preferential to an exam pass? If the SC roles you're after are strictly enforcing exam passes, maybe they're not actually looking for the right technical priorities.
youre not getting the issue here.
you are not allowed by vmware to take the exam without doing a qualifing course, its not about guessing.
when you book the exam you have to present your course certificate.
i
its not that it is more liek everybody has reasonable experience with VMWARE, lets be realistic it is more popular than rice crispies.
having the paper gives me an edge, a lim one agreed but in the markey and edge is an edge.
Not necessarily.
We tend to ignore certificates when recruiting because they have no bearing on the quality of candidate.
Have you already enough people qualifiedthen to keep your partner status?
Thats might be fine for your scenario but for most, if selling and delivering vmware solutions then it's almost essential, and for that you need a certain level of VCP's, qualified sales etc.
So the exams, every sodding two years, become a necessity and to a lot of companies, an important consideration when recruiting, either they have or have the ability to gain. Obviously if they have, it saves the £2500 course plus £170 exam.
And this comes from someone who hates doing exams...