around 300 pound.
But I have seen a tele lens in Amazon Sigma AF 70-300mm f4-5.6 DG Macro Canon fit lens. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-Macro-Canon/dp/tech-data/B000ALLMI8/ref=de_a_smtd
How about this lens? How about 18-55mm kit lens of canon?
around 300 pound.
But I have seen a tele lens in Amazon Sigma AF 70-300mm f4-5.6 DG Macro Canon fit lens. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-Macro-Canon/dp/tech-data/B000ALLMI8/ref=de_a_smtd
How about this lens? How about 18-55mm kit lens of canon?
That's not a macro purpose lens, it's a telezoom lens with kind of macro function.
For £300, I would suggest a Tamron 17-50 2.8 for landscape.
That's not a macro purpose lens, it's a telezoom lens with kind of macro function.
For £300, I would suggest a Tamron 17-50 2.8 for landscape.
I know it. Should I buy kit lens of canon which is 18-55mm? What do you think?
I agree, go for a used macro and a 18-55 kit lens.If you don't mind second hand then I would recommend the Canon 100mm Macro lens. Yes its not landscape but is fantastic for 1:1 macros and has a dual use as a great portrait lens.
18-55mm kit lens does the job admirably for landscapes if learning the ropes.