I have only just joined this forum so please go easy. I have noticed a lot of websites list the photography service as one of the following: documentary / reportage / photojournalist.
What, in your mind, defines a documentary photographer and is this any different to a photojournalist / reportage?
I've always thought that reportage and photojournalism are the same (probably wrong but hey) and definitely documentary is totally different?
To me, documentary is about story telling, capturing images that singularly and in conjunction with others, tell a story. Whereas reportage is about just capturing what you see and photojournalism is like reportage but you are removed and therefore capture anything and everything including not so pleasing imagery.
I got hooked on documentary style photography (mainly because my lecturer was a documentary wedding photographer) at uni and my friends were interested in the reportage / photojournalism styles.
Also, I understand why you have used the initials DKH, but are you aware that in some circles - namely my students - those initials are an abbreviation of something quite unpleasant and not something you wish to convey yourself as!?
It's not a question of hierarchy Dilip, it's more a question of working out what's going on.
Out of interest, I asked the 75 members of a closed forum I'm on (all very good, full-time wedding pros, invite only) what they thought the difference between the three terms of photojournalist, documentary and reportage was as they relate to wedding photography.
Overwhelming consensus was 'no difference beyond SEO'.
I got taught to question and ask and not be embarrassed to ask until I understood.