- Messages
- 694
- Name
- Rick
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi All,
I love my 300/f4 AF, so the 180 2.8 has caught my eye as a nice prime. Built like a tank, looks like it should be sharp as anything. But, I don't really have a use for it. If I want wildlife, the 300 gets the call. If I want shorted, a tele zoom gets used.
That got me thinking. What was the original intent of the 180 f/2.8? It is too short to be a sport and wildlife telephoto. It seems a little long for anything indoor and most portrait. So what would it have been used for?
Thanks
Rick
I love my 300/f4 AF, so the 180 2.8 has caught my eye as a nice prime. Built like a tank, looks like it should be sharp as anything. But, I don't really have a use for it. If I want wildlife, the 300 gets the call. If I want shorted, a tele zoom gets used.
That got me thinking. What was the original intent of the 180 f/2.8? It is too short to be a sport and wildlife telephoto. It seems a little long for anything indoor and most portrait. So what would it have been used for?
Thanks
Rick