Where do you share your photos?

Messages
34
Name
Daníel Örn Smárason
Edit My Images
Yes
Not sure where to put this,

But I am having some thoughts.
What website do you post your photos on appart from this website?

I have been posting on Facebook and instagram but I dont feel like it anymore.
I get 1-4 like usually on a picture. Not that it matters, but I feel like it is somewhat embarassing. Like the work i do is not even remotly good. In my mind my work is allright but after each post getting less and less likes its hard to keep that mindset

I dont thrive for likes or anything, I just feel like its somewhat useless to post there the way it is now. Facebook and instagram are pushing the reels/videos so hard that they barrely show photos.

So you have any websites/apps you use and like?
 
Re: The number of likes on a picture on Flickr, I personally don't even know if anyone has even looked, let alone liked, one or more of my photographs; if anyone has, thank you very much.

To get a barely-significant number of 'likes' on any photograph hosting website you'd have to be very good, very famous, or very, very fortunate.

From this website: Flickr statistics you can see that each day 25 million photographs are uploaded to Flickr so you should count yourself lucky that anyone at all has even seen your work let alone 'liked' one of your photographs.

I use Flickr as a store for photographs to post on this forum because it very easy to do. If I wasn't on this forum I would have no use for Flickr at all and would probably construct my own website and promote that accordingly.
 
I guess it depends what feedback you want and why you want it.
I used to post the odd photo on FB and Insta but almost never now, as those sites are just for staying in touch with people for me, nothing to do with my hobby of photography. I upload to Flickr, mainly for sharing images on this site, but pay little attention to the number of Faves I get (although I do appreciate them). I think for me all I'm interested in is getting a bit of feedback on whether I've done a decent job or not in producing a particular image, so I'd rather post to a photography site - TP - and ask for critique, if feedback is important.
 
Personally I share mine on FB, Camera Club Sites & some specialist subject sites (and here of course !)
On FB I make a point of belonging to several groups that either specialise in my subject or my type of photography.
For me its not about the likes, more the comments & critque. For example birding sites are mostly pleased with good quality photo's as are local FB wildlife groups.
I joined the Nikon D500 group on FB and sharing has been useful, leading to online chats about kit, techniques and locations.
I am also lucky to have a very active local Camera Club that encourages regular meets, lots of visits and competitions etc it uses a combination of FB and its own site.
 
In short I don’t. I will share them with family or friends if requested but I’ve long since stopped posting on Flickr etc because I do it for myself rather than chasing likes.

I will post an image on here from time to time but I’m not on regular social media anyway. I do have a website that I upload too occasionally.

Op you complain you only get a small handful of likes but then go onto say you don’t do it for the likes. Once you can take images for yourself rather than for other people’s approval you’ll be a lot happier!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RIR
It can be useful to examine one's motives and aims in picture-making. For me as for many, it's a personal exploration that up to a point is self-sustaining. But there may also be a wish to communicate. To me this involves a hope that some other might recognise some meaning in an image. Acknowledgment of this is gratifying. But I'm not making pretty pictures and wanting a pat on the back, which could be a world that many inhabit.

So try to get some clarity to do with exactly what you're about.
 
I use Flickr to both host and share a little. Used to post regularly to ello.co but the site folded recently.

Something worth mentioning - if posting photos for public consumption that will be viewed small, they need to be bright, punchy with strong shapes, colours and composition. Delicate, thoughtful, subtle or darker images will often just be ignored unless there's some bare skin present, and even then not so much. Always think of the target market.
 
I have a flickr account, but seem to post there in spurts, and rather rarely at that. In recent times, I've posted much more to twitter,, where there was an excellent film photography community until the apocoleX, and since then I've shifted to Mastodon (@carusb@photog.social for me, but it doesn't matter which server). There are a few hashtags, eg #BelieveInFlm that bring me in touch with other like-minded members there, and I've also been posting a more-or-less one photo per day there. Since getting involved in the film community on twitter, I'm afraid I've posted far fewer photos in the Talk Film & Conventional forum on here than I used to, though I still do take part in various group activities there. I've never posted a photo to FB and only one to insta, account since deleted!

PS one recent post on Mastodon, under the hashtag #FensterFreitag has received the most engagement ever for me, I think, 8 reposts and 33 likes at this poit. It's not much by flickr Explore standards, but it does give me a nice warm glow sometimes.
 
Last edited:
I use Flickr but at the end of the year bin nearly everything off and start again in the new year.
Other than that sometimes on here and sometimes on another site depending on what I'm sharing.

I think as a Winter project I might seriously look into setting up a web page on one of the many platforms that advertise on YouTube etc.
 
Last edited:
For Facebook and Instagram etc you can't just post a picture and expect likes people don't care enough and are literally to busy to use their thumb to hit like button mostly because when then are scrolling they are bombarded with images . To be successful you have to give them a reason to stop scrolling.....you have to give them something they can get out of it . Anyone that's doing it successfully are giving tips ...posting behind the scenes ....posting engaging content talking to camera , posting tips and tricks in other words they are building a community that's interested in them ..not just Thier images ......once that happens the likes will follow . So unless you want to do that just enjoy your photography and if you want some real proper feedback then maybe start entering comps
 
I share some on Facebook but only visible by family and friends

I also use Flickr but the platform is nothing like it used to be. I get a few likes and have had a few images explored (only when I was paying for pro, nothing since I stopped paying). I use Flickr mostly for me. It's a nice place to upload your images and have them available wherever you are.

I tried Vero for a bit but other than a short burst of activity it pretty much like Flickr..... Dead.
 
Mostly, I don't.

I take pictures for my benefit and really don't give a toss what other people think about them. I don't need critique or criticism and although it's nice to share/show them to those who may be interested occasionally I have no need to 'wave my willy' in public.

I would rather cut off, cook and eat my own testicles than use Faceache for anything. They are the undoing of all things good in the world IMO.

I have a couple of dozen images on Flickr, but the only reason is so that I could share those odd few on here when the mood takes me.

Any client images for sale are in private galleries on Pixieset with Loxley taking care of prints etc.
 
I post to some photography groups on FB (mostly my camera club group), very few on my personal & photography FB page, a rare one to Instagram and some here,
I should post more, I used to but I never chased the likes.
 
I think you are misunderstanding the nature of FB. It's there primarily to share nice pictures with your friends and relatives. Having said that there are groups, such as Let's Create where you can hopefully receive more attention. Perhaps you should try that?
 
Re: The number of likes on a picture on Flickr, I personally don't even know if anyone has even looked, let alone liked, one or more of my photographs; if anyone has, thank you very much.

To get a barely-significant number of 'likes' on any photograph hosting website you'd have to be very good, very famous, or very, very fortunate.

From this website: Flickr statistics you can see that each day 25 million photographs are uploaded to Flickr so you should count yourself lucky that anyone at all has even seen your work let alone 'liked' one of your photographs.

I use Flickr as a store for photographs to post on this forum because it very easy to do. If I wasn't on this forum I would have no use for Flickr at all and would probably construct my own website and promote that accordingly.

I agree with the very famous; and very fortunate part.

Majority of successful accounts on the likes of instagram etc. are the ones who live their day just to keep the algorithm happy.

Like everything…. Comment on everything…

Most of that I wouldn’t say was particularly “good” either. :D
 
I've used Flickr for years for my motorsport work, and still do but more as an online repository rather than looking for any great engagement. I've been on there for 15 years so I can look through my whole digital motorsport photography journey if I want to.

I started Instagram 8 years ago and built up a bit of a following, and used to post almost daily. However since the algorithm changes and their push for video I don't post anywhere near as much. There's no point posting a single photo anymore as nobody sees it. I have a business account so I can see the metrics, and a single image will only be shown to 5-8% of my followers. There's no point posting to a site that doesn't show anybody your work, so I just tend to infrequently post 10 image carousels now. I refuse to do video just to please an algorithm so people see my images so I just don't really bother much now. I tried Vero but it's dead. I post in a couple of Fuji Facebook groups as well.

To be honest, I don't do accredited work anymore, it's purely a hobby now so anybody actually seeing and liking my work is a bonus these days rather than the end goal.
 
Last edited:
None
This site sometimes.
Family & friends and our street's Whatsapp group if it is of local interest - mostly the local park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RIR
I use Flickr and like it a lot. I don't care much about the social media aspect of it although there are some really fine film photographers and film photography groups on there and I take great enjoyment in visiting the site every day.

Personally I use it mainly as a way to document my personal 'journey' in photography. I lead a semi-nomadic life style due to my profession and it's nice to keep memories of places I've been or things I've seen or people I've met.

The fact that other people can see my photos while I pursue the above doesn't bother me at all (in fact I like to share camera, film, processing techniques I use, in the perhaps selfish hope to have more people try the same stuff, getting into film photography and keeping the consumables industry alive) but my real friends and my "community" is elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
It depends on the intended audience e.g:
  • Pictures of my kids/neice go into Apple Photos shared albums, which friends and family have access to.
  • MTB race photos go on to the appropriate race results website/Facebook group.
Then a few highlights will go onto my blog, social media (usually the relevant Fuji/local group) and on here of course. Via Flickr.

Unfortunately, Flickr seems to have lost the social aspect and fallen out of favour, but given how Instagram has moved towards videos, maybe we should all make an effort to follow photographers we like and make more use of the social side of Flickr...
 
I have my own web site which is really just a vanity project. It doesn't collect stats so I have to download and analyse the logs if I want to know if anyone is looking at it. I occasionally post links to individual photos or complete albums but don't otherwise promote it.
 
I use Flickr but I really don’t get it sometimes, the other day there was a ‘photo’ of a pig, totally out of focus, hanging off the end of the frame with rest overexposed yet it had over 80 likes! It was awful…mine on the other hand are all ‘ok’ and attract around 15 likes each, though I did have one go mad the other day even made ‘explore’ with well over 300 likes, but I can’t see how the algorithm works for the life of me. I also had an email from the bbc to say one of my photos made it to their website Englands big picture….that was nice. Www.flickr.com/philsheath
 
We haven't heard here from the OP since their opening post. A fly-by-night, it seems ...

I've said this before I think, but Flickr is still good if you choose what you look at & put the leg-work in. There can be a genuine sense of other individuals (and an ad hoc community) to be found there.

I'm not really of the social media generation and its cravings for popularity. Dialogue is good, & at root we do all like to be recognised - not just as people, but for what we choose to do in any avenue that we choose to engage with. But hopefully, we do that in daily life and whatever we do on the internet is somewhat secondary.

With the internet, there's such a plethora of posted material available - this is one of its weaknesses & one of its strengths.

It's a place to stay sober, and remember the healthy track of real life.

Hey!
 
We haven't heard here from the OP since their opening post. A fly-by-night, it seems ...
He’s been a member for a couple of years so not quite a fly by but … :(
 
It can be useful to examine one's motives and aims in picture-making. For me as for many, it's a personal exploration that up to a point is self-sustaining. But there may also be a wish to communicate. To me this involves a hope that some other might recognise some meaning in an image. Acknowledgment of this is gratifying. But I'm not making pretty pictures and wanting a pat on the back, which could be a world that many inhabit.

So try to get some clarity to do with exactly what you're about.
This pretty much sums up what I was going to say after reading the OP, It felt to me like the OP was looking for a purpose to their photography rather than just somewhere to share. I find the zine exchanges on here and elsewhere a good way of inflicting my rubbish on other people, also printing stuff and hanging it on the wall.
 
In short I don’t. I will share them with family or friends if requested but I’ve long since stopped posting on Flickr etc because I do it for myself rather than chasing likes.

I will post an image on here from time to time but I’m not on regular social media anyway. I do have a website that I upload too occasionally.

Op you complain you only get a small handful of likes but then go onto say you don’t do it for the likes. Once you can take images for yourself rather than for other people’s approval you’ll be a lot happier!

My thoughts entirely except I don't have a web site and I don't use social media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RIR
In January 2020 we went on a group holiday to Costa Rica, but only a few of us had decent cameras. So during the Covid lockdown which followed, I built a website to share images with the whole group. It was fun to do and it was definitely appreciated by all.

 
It can be useful to examine one's motives and aims in picture-making. For me as for many, it's a personal exploration that up to a point is self-sustaining. But there may also be a wish to communicate. To me this involves a hope that some other might recognise some meaning in an image. Acknowledgment of this is gratifying. But I'm not making pretty pictures and wanting a pat on the back, which could be a world that many inhabit.

So try to get some clarity to do with exactly what you're about.
Well I do post some on FB. Put a lot of bird dog photo's on it and got some good likes and yep, I live on the likes. Do put some on my reg page and yes I do hope people that like them will say so. I have what all of us has, that's an ego. And when you feed my ego, I like it! Took a photo of a local barn week or so ago and put a new type frame on it I made from scratch. Took it down to get an opinion of it from a resident I already knew would like it. Ya know what, if I'd have though she wouldn't care for it I wouldn't have taken it. She's no pro. Gonna take some to the valley with me Tuesday to show my nephew if he's home and don't know how much he will like them but pretty sure he'll make me feel good, he is a pro! I think to keep going you need to have your ego soothed now and then. Of course to move forward you need your ego hurt now and then too!
 
Mainly on here, and Flickr. Don`t do FB or Insta.
But I only shoot for myself, so not bothered about likes as such. I do agree the social side of Flickr is on a massive downward slide, which is a shame. TP is much mor insightful, and helpful (y)
 
The first website I used to post on was Flickr and it seemed to have more life in it back then. Since then I have at different times posted on 500px, Facebook, Instagram, Vero and a couple of minor photo sharing websites and of course this forum.
When I first started photography as a hobby it was enjoyable getting likes and comments etc. but I found that eventually the novelty wore off and now this forum is the only site I post on (via Flickr), This site feels like it has much more substance / depth to it than all the others that I have come across. If I found another site like Flickr used to be then maybe I would post there too because I used to use that as inspiration for locations (or techniques) that caught my eye so like the idea that someone might see a photo of mine that leads to them going there or learning something like I did many times.

A couple of people have asked me before what I do with my images if I don't post them on Instagram or Facebook....as if to say, what's the point of going to such lengths and expense with what could be seen as no "end result" and I have wondered myself about the end result and have come to the conclusion that the main things I get from it are....

Enjoyment being out with a camera.
Physical Exercise.
Mental Exercise.
Discovering new places / locations.
Enjoyment processing an image trying to get the best out of it and a buzz if I do manage to achieve something I really like.

My significant other is one who doesn't really understand what I get from it and I feel like asking her what she gets from watching crap tv or online shopping (often followed by returning the items shortly after).

I do print some of my photos at 6 x 4 and have them on my kitchen photo wall but also sometimes think about printing more of them and putting in albums like people used to do when I was a child. I can imagine when I'm old and maybe if I have grandchildren they might like to look at my "old photos" just like I used to, and still do like looking at old photos. I'm sure most people like to do that.

A bit of a ramble off topic but seems relevant to me.
 
Thank you for all the replies.

This wasnt a Fly by post, I took a small break from social websites.

Its not that I thrive from Likes and Comments. And alot of you might not understand, Its very hard for me to descripe.

Its kind of like I feel embaressed for having such a low like count, might sound very strange for people who did not "Grow up" with social media and even for those who did.
Ofcourse I try to not mind because it almost makes no sense to think this way. But i've found something that works for me, If I post on Facebook stories and hide the like count on Instagram its not so bad. and I get to share my photos without the downside of having to "worry about the likes"

I do like the progress of taking photos and editing them. But If I dont post them I think, Why do all this work for no one to see.
So thats kind of why.
I was hoping that most hobby photographers have all moved to a new platform that was more like Instagram few years back, since now I dont really see alot of Hobby photographers, only the pro ones on Insta.
 
I'm glad you have returned to see the responses to your questions @Danniorn
I think in summary that what hobby photographers are saying is that the main social media sites are not of interest to them any more for posting their images, as they are more now for reels and videos.
If you share images on a photography site, you are far more likely to get both Likes and genuine feedback which you can use to develop your skills. On FB/Insta etc you won't get any volume of Likes and Followers unless you are properly marketing yourself such that your images are going in front of people - the hash tags and other features for SEO within the particular SM sites are what will get people looking at your work, so unless you want to spend more time engineering your social media presence than actually doing photography, you will always be disappointed by the number of Likes. Surely as a hobby photographer, you should be taking a more selfish approach of concentrating on your own enjoyment rather than other peoples fickle opinions?
 
An interesting thread that I can sort of see from both sides of the coin as someone who grew up in the years were social media wasn’t a thing, but one of my brothers being younger grew up in the golden age of social media and leveraged it to the hilt. So much so it ended up helping him launch a few successful businesses but had a massive downside as well, including having his identity stolen and used to scam people worldwide out of hundreds of thousands of pounds. The B.B.C recently did a documentary on my brother’s experiences on social media which is still on iplayer at the moment.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001rs7s/hunting-the-catfish-crime-gang

For Instagram anyway it isn’t enough to post good photos or videos as nobody will see them, you have to build an audience to be successful on there. To build an audience means that you have to put yourself out there. This means lots of personal posts as that is what ordinary people actually want to see. While Instagram works okay for me, personally I don’t use it in the same way other professional photographers do. Instagram for me is just purely a vehicle for sending people to my website, I have no other interest in it. Recently partly due to my brother’s documentary I have had the opportunity to speak to people who are very successful on social media with millions of followers across the various platforms. All of them got successful by doing the same thing and living their lives on social media and sharing lots of personal information. For me personally that is not something I would be comfortable doing, maybe its an age thing, I don’t know, but the thought of posting videos of myself etc. make me cringe to the max.

Instagram in itself isn’t a good place to start from scratch on as a photographer today in terms of gaining popularity on social media. TikTok has overtaken it massively as the go to place to be for people within the under 30’s age group especially. Just as one example one of my brothers friends has a following of over 16 million on TikTok and just a few hundred thousand on Instagram. Both accounts were started on the same day and have exactly the same content posted to them.

For the o.p question has to be why due you seek popularity on social media? Unless you plan on leveraging that in some way there doesn’t really seem to be any point. I clicked on your Instagram link there in your forum signature and viewed your profile and it seems that you are trying to leverage Instagram to sell prints of your work. Selling landscape prints is very difficult even for people who have a large following on social media as we live in an age were most people see these types of photos as something they should be able to download for free. I am told that even the people that follow you due to the Instagram algorithm will only see 1% of your posts, you aren’t using hashtags etc either so very few people are going to be scrolling through Instagram and see any of your posts.

Please don't take this the wrong way but your account isn't very interesting as its just a lot of random landscape photos and reels, there is nothing there that differentiates your account from the millions of others which are very similar. The way you can make it more interesting for anyone that stumbles across it is to put yourself out there but be warned that has it own potential for creating it's own issues but comes as part and parcel of what you need to do to be successful on there.

The quality of work you post to Instagram doesn't really matter that much, most people can not tell the difference between good and bad especially on a phone screen.

For me personally I am a wedding photographer, lots of wedding photographers spend an insane amount of time on social media with multiple posts a day, trying to beat the algorithm and for many it works well and they book lots of work from these platforms. The ones that are successful put themselves out there. That isn’t for me at all, so I use socials purely for generating traffic to my website. Then hopefully once people reach our website, they like our work and how we do things and then get in touch. This also means I don’t need to worry as much as others do when the platforms they use become less popular. I have been around long enough to see other wedding photographers become very successful by promoting themselves on Facebook, then when Facebook died so did their businesses. The same thing is now happening with Instagram.
 
Last edited:
One recipe to get a lot of likes on social media is to show tits.

There's a guy from up North, very active on all sorts of social media, also reviews film camera gear and has a seemingly endless supply of scantily clad eastern European models to choose from. He goes by the name of Doctor Leica or something.

Absolutely pedestrian, vulgar photography, but hard nipples in the cold Polish weather = many, many likes.
 
TBH if I were the OP - living in Iceland and a hobby photographer - I would be more focused on leveraging the place where I live and building a business taking photographers from elsewhere around the many stunning locations in Iceland, not as a expert landscaper but as an expert Icelander who recognises the opportunities for photography, and doing my/his own photography on the back of that.
 
Has anyone tried behance and got any business out from posting there? This is adobe platform, so most of us with CC sub have it.

Otherwise flickr, but I've not been well motivated to post much.

I don't like insta, I don't like copyright stance of meta and all image theft but I fear this may need to be look at after some treatment in Adobe express to make it less stealable.
 
i have tried things like facebook flickr and instagram but tend to get bored posting to them - a personal website seems to work best for me - i used to use wordpress which is one of the most popular platforms but now use drupal as i prefer it for usability
 
...but now use drupal as i prefer it for usability
I see it's up to version 10, now.

I was on a large project, about 12 years ago, which used it. I was working on the site's logging and management side, so I only saw the output files. The coders who working on the front end seemed happy with it.
 
My online photos are a mess. I've got quite a lot of Flickr, but nothing recent, loads on Google Photos, and I've paid for extra storage. I used to have a Gallery site on my son's server. This was extremely useful when I wrote ride reports for my cycle touring, but unfortunately my stuff isn't there now and all the links to the photos dating back quite a few years are dead. I now have a server of my own but sadly I lack the expertise to get Gallery up and running. It's something I hope to tackle, but it's a pretty daunting project.

Which brings me to a question: I've only just joined this forum. Does it offer hosting space?
 
Which brings me to a question: I've only just joined this forum. Does it offer hosting space?
@Wowbagger Sorry, no we don't offer hosting space on TP. There are plenty of places that do that who can afford to maintain their IT services (we run TP in our spare time): many use Flickr, adobe, amazon, google, iCloud for various different cloud hosting options.
 
Back
Top