Which IS mode?

Messages
128
Name
John
Edit My Images
No
I'm intending to visit the farm in mid Wales where they feed the Red Kites. I've got my Canon 100-400mm to use but I honestly don't know which IS mode I will need. I am so used to panning that it stays on Mode 2 all the time but the Kites will be diving and swooping so will I need Mode 1 (both axis) or Mode 2 (panning)?

Cheers!
 
1 for vertical and horizontal movement. 2 for panning.
I'm sure there will be others along shortly to back that up.... or not
 
Hmmm interesting...

I didn't even know there were different types of IS. :lol:


Well, when shooting MF, who needs it? Lol. I guess you learn something new everyday!
 
1 for vertical and horizontal movement. 2 for panning.
I'm sure there will be others along shortly to back that up.... or not

:agree:

It doesn't matter what the subject is doing as the IS only affects the camera movement. If you can steadily pan (in either plane) then I'd use mode 2. You may be better off switching the IS off altogether though;) HTH
 
Mode 1 tries to prevent all movement. You won't want that.

Mode 2 tries to figure out whether you are trying to pan horizontally or vertically and will reduce shake/vibration at 90 degrees to the pan. It would be a good choice if you are panning exactly vertically or horizontally.

If you are attempting to pan diagonally, or follow erratic, swooping movements by the birds then turn IS off. It will fight with your attempts to follow the birds, causing an odd, jerky sensation in the viewfinder and probably doing more harm than good. My advice would be to turn IS off completely and use a high shutter speed of around 1/1000 or more to minimise the appearance of shake. I use the 100-400 myself for BIF and that's my approach. There are plenty of birders who do very nicely with the unstabilised 400/5.6L. They don't seem to have a problem shooting without IS. So long as the shutter speed is sufficiently high, hopefully neither will you.

Here's an example from Gigrin shot at 400mm and 1/800, without IS, slightly cropped and tweaked.....

20100616_152450_7817_LR-3.jpg


If you have the opportunity to pick the day you go, try to choose a day when the wind will be coming from behind you. That way the birds will soar gracefully towards you, making shooting easy and giving you lots of opportunity to capture the eyes. When I went it was a dreadful time of year, with the sun high in the sky and the wind into our faces. The easiest shots to make were of the birds' arses - not my favourite kind of shot. If we'd turned round to shoot the birds as they approached from behind us we would have been shooting into the sun. It was a poor day. :(
 
Last edited:
As always good advice from Tim. Just too add that white cloud is also pretty crappy for flight shots. A sunny late autumn day with a low sun is good. The experts say the best days have low sun and snow on the ground to reflect light under the birds. I've never been that lucky with the weather though.
It's also a good idea to stay a while after the feeding as the birds tend to return later and seem less frenzied and easier to shoot. It's a spectacular sight if you've never visited before. Enjoy:)
 
Thanks very much for the advice. I've never tried this lens with IS turned off so it will be quite interesting. Also thanks for the heads up on how to get good shots of the birds - thats really useful information :)

Hopefully I'll have some decent pics to post in a few weeks!
 
Back
Top