Who's changed from Adobe (LR / PS) to either ON1 Photo Raw OR DXO pureraw / photolab?

Messages
7,050
Name
Paul
Edit My Images
No
Im exploring getting rid of the subs model, these 2 seem to be the best recommended by some searches via youtube etc so wonderin if anyone here has actually done so and loved / regretted it?
 
I tried On1 for quite a few years but never really got round to using it regularly now use Lightroom CC alongside DXO PURE RAW between the two get results I'm happy with
Russ
 
I've just installed the new edition of PhotoRaw : 2026.4 and suddenly all those promises of making it faster have become true. I could use it if I didn't have lightroom, but it's just not quite as good to use.
 
Photolab + Affinity (free) does everything for me ... wouldn't go back to Adobe.
what's affinity like? ie would you compare to a LR substitute or PS substitute?
 
what's affinity like? ie would you compare to a LR substitute or PS substitute?
I never used LR except to trial it and I hated the way it wanted to take control. For me Photolab and Affinity work together with Affinity being the final touch before exporting. Maybe the two together replacing everything Photoshop did for me.
It’s possible that Affinity on its own could replace the last Photoshop I used.
 
I've been using ON1 for the last couple of years mainly because it provides a complete workflow solution and the ability for auto edits if time for PP needs minimising.

The new 2026.4 version should be even faster but doesn't like to play with some of my photos!
 
Same as Gramps Affinty and DXO for me too
At the time a few years ago Affinity was better for what I needed to do but at the time the Raw converter was limited (its ok now apparently) so tried DXO 5 and really like using it and the results were great, am now on DXO 8 elite
Keeping up to date with DXO (if you want to but not strictly necessary) isn’t cheaper than Adobe but I preferred the results from DXO 5 to Adobe at the time
 
Can you work in DXO and Affinity together, as you can in LRC and PS i.e you can edit an image in LRC send it over to PS with the edits, then do further work in PS then send it back to LRC with all the edits intact, and you can do that as much as you want. So can you do all of that in DXO and Affinity ?
 
Can you work in DXO and Affinity together, as you can in LRC and PS i.e you can edit an image in LRC send it over to PS with the edits, then do further work in PS then send it back to LRC with all the edits intact, and you can do that as much as you want. So can you do all of that in DXO and Affinity ?
Never felt the need ... I use PL5 from several years ago (2021) and the original Affinity Photos, so have had no 'editor' costs since PL5.
Do the best I can in camera > open in PL5 for minimal edits > export to Affinity for final polish and save to folder.
 
Can you work in DXO and Affinity together, as you can in LRC and PS i.e you can edit an image in LRC send it over to PS with the edits, then do further work in PS then send it back to LRC with all the edits intact, and you can do that as much as you want. So can you do all of that in DXO and Affinity ?
There isn't the same need to do this with DXO and Affinity, as DXO doesn't have a catalogue. The LR to PS round trip mechanism is primarily to auto catalogue the PS adjustments, without needing to manually sync the catalogue.

With DXO because it's constantly viewing the "actual" folder where the files live (not a preview in a catalogue), as soon as you save an Affinity generated file "with the original raw", DXO will see it.

I'm pretty sure DXO doesn't read Affinity files (nor PSD or PSB) so you would need to set the defaults in Affinity to always use TIFFs if you wanted to view the files with DXO. Again I'm not sure how much you would lose by working with TIFFs in Affinity over working with the native Affinity files. When I used Affinity Photo I had it default to PSDs, and wasn't aware of any issues.

Although DXO doesn't have a DAM, it does have some rudimentary file management and indexing tools (like Adobe Bridge) so being able to see them would still be useful, but DXO has only a few tools that work with TIFFs so realistically, you would still need to reopen Affinity if you wanted to do further work on a file.
 
Back
Top