Im after a 10-20mm (or there abouts) wide angle lens, with 10mm being at its widest.
And I do not want a fisheye lens, im after a lens for landscape photography.
Now I see there are two real choices I have..
Sigma 10-20 mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM (non hsm for pentax + sony)
Or
Sigma 10-20 mm F3.5 EX DC HSM
Now my question is, will the first one be good enough, or do you reckon its worth saving to get HSM and f3.5?
Anyone here uses either lens? Will I really need HSM as I have built in IS and AF within the body of my camera?
And I do not want a fisheye lens, im after a lens for landscape photography.
Now I see there are two real choices I have..
Sigma 10-20 mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM (non hsm for pentax + sony)
Or
Sigma 10-20 mm F3.5 EX DC HSM
Now my question is, will the first one be good enough, or do you reckon its worth saving to get HSM and f3.5?
Anyone here uses either lens? Will I really need HSM as I have built in IS and AF within the body of my camera?