Wiiiide

[TCR4x4]

My Siggy 12-24 that I wasnt going to buy but did anyway turned up today.
Boy, 12mm is pretty wide on FF!

Havent used it in anger yet, just in the garden. It seems to underexpose quite a lot, not sure why that is

Nothing a bit of EC wont sort out I guess.

Must remeber when shooting to move my legs/feet back. I almost had several shots of my wellingtons!
Seems well built like most Sigma EX lenses and isnt as heavy as I was expecting. Look forward to using it for the shots I had in mind at the Cathedral!

 

[woof woof]

I have one of these on APS-C and have only looked through it on my real RAW 35mm but wide is the word.

I think I'm right in saying that some people make a point of including their feet in shot

 

[Mike.P]

I decided it was time to go on a diet when I took a photo with my Sigma 12-24mm and my stomach was in shot.

 

[TCR4x4]

Haha, yeah, certainly need to suck it in whilst shooting at 12mm!

 

[Nod]

At first, I used to get my belly and feet in shot with the 12-24 but soonj learned to lean forward just far enough. Even harder to keep 'em out of shot with an 8mm fisheye!

 

[arad85]

I just knew this thread would be about the 12-24 on FF Yes, I have one, yes, I love the photos it produces (I have a test shot which includes my feet and roof of our house and I was only standing 30ft from the house at the time...)