OP
Steve
Guest
Matt said:No objections from me matey.
You might find you've got a bit of competition now though, some great images this round.
Without meaning to sound arsey...thats why I would like to enter
Matt said:No objections from me matey.
You might find you've got a bit of competition now though, some great images this round.
Steve said:Although any fiddling would be apparent it may put some people off as they may not wish others to see which they voted for?
Nothing is ever straightforward but I would like to keep things as simple and fair as possible.
Steve said:No the problem is that EVERYONE could vote for their own if it was done in a poll therefore everyone could end up with the same scores and the comp could be a draw with everyone holding first position. Unless you mean me vote for myself under the current system, in which case that comes back to you trusting me?
Matt said:IMO the winner isn't the person who comes first, its the person who learns and benefits most from the experience.
Don't know where that came from
CT said:Steep
I liked it a lot. Is that a sepia treatment?
Gregeff said:Edit:/ Just out of interest how does the voting work? Does the first choice get a heavier weighting than the 2nd and the second heavier than the 3rd etc? Or is each worth the same as each other?
Steep said:Shot 12 Petemc, Could have done with some perspective adjustments on the cathederal and needs rotating slightly (going by the cylinder thing in the foreground)
CT said:Petemc
I'd never have sussed this as being Pete's work - it's so far removed from his usual style. The converging verticals could have been corrected pete and the shot just lacked a bit of punch.
feeson said:12) Petemc - A good shot of an impressive building. I guess you were out early in the day to get it without people in frame.
feeson said:10) Dod - I find this quite a difficult one, it looks soft to me and I dont like the way that everything bar the roof has been desaturated but it has got the "look at me again" factor.
KenCo1964 said:4. CT: like Aeryk01 its certainly an architectural building but just lacked a punch, different angle or something. Sorry m8.
Ken.
Steve said:I think you where drawn to both the tower and the statue to the left of it and couldnt quite frame it properly to get the impact. Nice exposure, lighting and post-production though
.
KenCo1964 said:23. Oz: sorry Oz but another in my eyes that was let down by looking as if it was taken because it was there, rather than up close and personal. No intrigue or mystery could have been so much more interesting, I wish we had a windmill close by.