Does anyone know if this lens would fit and work well with a Nikon D3200? I don't have one, but am considering one, or is it a bit of an expensive lens to be putting on a £300 body?
Anyone any idea when this is available for Nikon?
Had a quick look, on Tamron's site, but couldn't see any date.
So, a question for all the owners of this lens that have also had or used a Sigma 150-500 OS. Is the IQ from the Tamron better, worse or about the same as the Sigma. I've got a very sharp Sigma that I'm very happy with and was wondering if it's worth changing to the Tamron. I know I'd gain an extra 100mm, but is that enough to justify the outlay.
AFAIK that isnt strictly speaking true now in this particular case, if you accept an item is faulty and agree to it being repaired you have in legal terms "accepted it with its known faults" and from that moment on are on sticky ground in terms of getting a refund. In cases where you think you may want a refund you are far better demanding a refund at the outset and sticking to your guns, sale of goods act etc, fit for purpose etc.The retailer gives you a refund, they sold you a faulty item, it is their responsibility to sort it out with you. THEN they go to the manufacturer with THEIR faulty goods.
That would probably be better than getting the original lens back repaired I guess, you would be entitled to have a fit-for-purpose item for a reasonable period of time, 2/3 days isnt a reasonable period by anyones's standards so therefore could then get a refund (I suppose).The thing is, what's the chance I'll be issued with another faulty lens? I've tested this one on the day of purchase and it seemed fine. It's after two or three days I've realised something is not 100% right and it's Tamron who actually confirmed AF issues.
A decent "shop" going above and beyond, strictly speaking they didnt have to, but then they would have lost you as a future customer I guess.I had my D7000 for 11 months. Took it back and got another because the AF was faulty. In between that time I got it "fixed".
@sthwild..............any update fella?
Thanks bud, could you let us know the results please?Just got the lens yesterday and today I'm working, so didn't have enough time to play properly. First quick test shows improvement in terms of focusing on stationary objects. Before when you refocus from nearer object to further one and other way around the lens, instead of going from further to nearer, would go to infinity first and then back. Now it all seems to work perfectly. I'm still going to try BIF over the weekend.
ANY ONE WANT ONE? http://www.ffordes.com/search/Tamron
ha ha did'nt spot that no wonder they have them in stock then its a sellers market when no one else has got them thoughAt £200 more than they sell for at wex, parks, cameraworld, jessops etc.. I'll give it a miss and wait on the stock getting sorted.
ha ha did'nt spot that no wonder they have them in stock then its a sellers market when no one else has got them though
quite agree seems people are not having a great deal of success with them slow af/ faults and not much good in low light from what peeps have been saying. as i said earlier tamron not my first choice for third party lenses. cheers mikeOr not, with the controversy surrounding the lens!
I'm sure we're only hearing of a small percentage of bad apples which is to be expected with any new product and that there's many happy owners out there we aren't hearing about.
i'd like to see someone saying how great this lens is phil, but hav'nt seen it yet. cheers mike.I'm sure we're only hearing of a small percentage of bad apples which is to be expected with any new product and that there's many happy owners out there we aren't hearing about.
ha ha lol lol lol NOTI think it's great.
I'm sure we're only hearing of a small percentage of bad apples which is to be expected with any new product and that there's many happy owners out there we aren't hearing about.
i'd like to see someone saying how great this lens is phil, but hav'nt seen it yet. cheers mike.