So the mysterious "super telephoto" has been confirmed as 150-400mm f/4-5.6, with a mockup on display.
So the mysterious "super telephoto" has been confirmed as 150-400mm f/4-5.6, with a mockup on display.
Really? I never seen that.
Like the look of the 16-55. Doesn't look much bigger than the 10-24 in size.
No OIS for the 16-55, that's me and my shaky hands out then. When you think how long Canon users have been wanting a 24-70 with IS I think this may be a mistake from Fuji
Looks like the firmware update is going to be November
16mm looks nice, all the others are a bit too big/heavy for my liking. Might just as well stick to a regular size body if the lenses are of an equivalent size, defeats the whole object of the exercise for me
Is it any good?
106£ printed!!! To me book that are 500 pages+ are a pain to read on a computer screen!
How do you find the camera / 18-135mm weight, it does look quite a beefy lens.
I'm still pondering which lenses to go for, I want it to be light as it will be going up many hills but useful. I'm thinking the 18-55mm to begin with but I do like the look of the 18mm, tiny and almost weightless.
Aaargh... confused.
In terms of 'usefulness' you can't beat a zoom. You're not just covered at the widest angle. The 18-55 is hardly big or heavy.
True, but I do have feet (or the bipedal zoom as its known) I often go out with my D7100 and just a 24mm lens to keep weight down but I do prefer a zoom, just makes life easier.
I'm off to Manchestah this afternoon to go and test cameras and lenses in Jessops so I should have a better idea of where I'm going with this later today.
I have to say that seeing the images on this thread and on flirkr I'm very, very impressed with the IQ.
True, but I do have feet (or the bipedal zoom as its known) I often go out with my D7100 and just a 24mm lens to keep weight down but I do prefer a zoom, just makes life easier.
I'm off to Manchestah this afternoon to go and test cameras and lenses in Jessops so I should have a better idea of where I'm going with this later today.
I have to say that seeing the images on this thread and on flirkr I'm very, very impressed with the IQ.
Oh, don't forget to turn on high performance in settings, it makes quite a large difference to operation and AF speed
Don't forget a spare battery either especially with high performance on
Depending what you take photos of, but the 14mm is a nice lens too and a length not covered by any of the zooms (current or future) Stated my view on the 18-135mm and other large lenses to the point of boredom, but just too big for me and defeats the whole object of the smaller set up.
He's only going to test anyway so I doubt he needs to worry about that.
Good point, reckon I average about 300 on a full battery, daresay the wi-fi would hammer it even more. Wish the low battery warning was a bit more forgiving, only manage about two more shots once it shows up before the big red battery symbol appears and that's your lot.
Percentage or shots left left would be a nice firmware change, didn't see it mentioned though
How do you find the camera / 18-135mm weight, it does look quite a beefy lens.
I'm still pondering which lenses to go for, I want it to be light as it will be going up many hills but useful. I'm thinking the 18-55mm to begin with but I do like the look of the 18mm, tiny and almost weightless.
Aaargh... confused.
True, but I do have feet (or the bipedal zoom as its known) I often go out with my D7100 and just a 24mm lens to keep weight down but I do prefer a zoom, just makes life easier.
How do you find the camera / 18-135mm weight, it does look quite a beefy lens.
I'm still pondering which lenses to go for, I want it to be light as it will be going up many hills but useful. I'm thinking the 18-55mm to begin with but I do like the look of the 18mm, tiny and almost weightless.
Aaargh... confused.
Do we know when the 50-14mm F2.8 will be on the market? Thanks
It's an XT1 shot in a XT1 thread...?
The X-T1 isnt 5 years old.
My daughter is though!