- Messages
- 3,772
- Name
- Trevor
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Luckily, no one was onboard or this would have been a real tragedy:
View: https://youtu.be/5r-yN8SugWM
I was surprised to see pedestrians walking close by while a fountain of sparks was going up.Luckily, no one was onboard or this would have been a real tragedy:
View: https://youtu.be/5r-yN8SugWM
The vast majority of vehicle fires are due to electrical faults; regardless of the method of propulsion... but modern electronics/batteries can be smarter/safer than older technologies.Fires in combustion vehicles are at a far higher rate than electric ones.
I have often mused this over the years but to be fair i think i would rather take my chances with batteries behind me than the 70 litres of unleaded my little snail can carry , i am lead to believe that stuff goes up rather quick and does one a lot more damage in the short term.
A bit odd that — there seemed to be an explosion in the roof but surely the batteries aren’t up there?fact, I doubt anyone would have known anything about it until the explosion as the smoke was above and would have been blown back away from the bus.
A bit odd that — there seemed to be an explosion in the roof but surely the batteries aren’t up there?
It does. I wonder if it's a safety design? It would be a bad idea to be anywhere near a lithium fire but given the choice, underneath would be better than on top for the very first moments.Putting the batteries in the roof would give it an awful centre of balance. Seems very odd.
Fires in combustion vehicles are at a far higher rate than electric ones. For those of us with a memory remember the Vauxhalls that were burning people's houses down and all the BMWs setting themselves alight regularly a few years ago. My own BMW petrol car was recalled for the same risk.
Government data show gasoline vehicles are up to 100x more prone to fires than EVs
Aside from the argument that gasoline vehicles operate via combustion, a study shows how prevalent gas vehicle fires are compared to EVs.electrek.co
Are you refering to Grosjeans crash? the driver of the Medical car tried to suppress the flames while the Doctor pulled Grosjean out the car.There was a crash in a F1 GP last year. The car hit a barrier and burst into flames. A steward attacked the flames and ( i think) a safety car medic pulled the driver out and to safety.
These are unmistakably brave guys. However, after the fuel fire was extinguished the red ligh was flashing on the DRS system lithium battery. They wouldn't go within 20 yards of it.
A lithium cell collapse creates a chain reaction. It's self feeding, needs no oxygen and 10,000 gals of water barely touches it.
A Lithium expert was on the radio a few weeks back. When asked if he would live near a Solar farm feeding Lithium buffer cells he said he wouldn't live within 2 miles.
Putting the batteries in the roof would give it an awful centre of balance. Seems very odd.
Yes that was the crash I was referring to. Thanks for the info.Are you refering to Grosjeans crash? the driver of the Medical car tried to suppress the flames while the Doctor pulled Grosjean out the car.
The Red light indicates that the hybrid system is not safe and that there is a risk of huge electrical shock if you touch the car. The DRS is only a section of the rear wing that opens to reduce drag.
I cant recall the race or the driver but this year a car stopped on circuit and the driver was told by his engineer to jump from the car so as not to ground himself as the Red light was on. the Driver was telling the marshalls all to keep away and then one of the team had to go down to the car with special gloves to disable it.
Currently the majority of EV Lithium Ion batteries are produced by LG, Samsung & Panasonic, switching to Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries puts the power squarely into China's hands as currently they produce approximately 95% of the global Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries, and that does have potential political ramifications.
Engine fires following a crash are generally hydraulic (brake / clutch) fluid leaking on to the exhaust, because it will spontaneously combust at exhaust manifold temperatures. Petrol won't, despite going up very fast once it's ignited, it requires a source of ignition to get going as there's nothing hot enough to get it going without one in an engine bay. The combusting brake fluid can provide it, though almost all of the fuel is usually at the opposite end of the vehicle to the engine (my Twingo is an exception).I have often mused this over the years but to be fair i think i would rather take my chances with batteries behind me than the 70 litres of unleaded my little snail can carry , i am lead to believe that stuff goes up rather quick and does one a lot more damage in the short term.
I got told it at a fire safety training day at a race circuit in the early 1990s. Doesn't make it true of course, but it's an environment where they have to deal with crashed cars leaking fluids so I've tended to rely on it.Having had a car catch fire purely due to petrol falling on a hot exhaust manifold, I'm not sure that's right.
I have a vague memory of being told that petrol is hard to ignite but petrol vapour is real easy to ignite.
When I was doing my ADR we were told petrol becomes volatile at 21oCI have a vague memory of being told that petrol is hard to ignite but petrol vapour is real easy to ignite.
I did it with paraffin when I was a teenager...When I was doing my ADR we were told petrol becomes volatile at 21oC
So as long as the temperature was below that, you could drop a match into a bucket of petrol and it would extinguish.
I never had the balls to test that theory though
yep thats why diesel cars will fall of a cliff in the next few years especially high end cars their value will plummetChatting to an ex boss (car sales owner) and I asked if he thought there would be a surge in ev sales, “F*ck I hope not”was the reply, “what an earth would the trade do with an influx of normal! cars that nobody wants, or expects to buy for pennies”.
When I was doing my ADR we were told petrol becomes volatile at 21oC
So as long as the temperature was below that, you could drop a match into a bucket of petrol and it would extinguish.
I never had the balls to test that theory though
Yes. It's only the vapour thats flammable.A bucket (although I'd recommend a mug - who can afford to fill a bucket with petrol these days?!!!) FULL to the brim would probably douse the match but 1/2 full would trap enough vapour to be a rather more dangerous experiment.
That was my point too.Yes. It's only the vapour thats flammable.
Let me know when I can get my A6 quattro TDI or X5 for pennies.yep thats why diesel cars will fall of a cliff in the next few years especially high end cars their value will plummet
Let me know when I can get my A6 quattro TDI or X5 for pennies.
Charming.no one gives a monkeys about you mate