A 35mm and 85mm two lens kit is pretty common, so I can see the comparison from that point of view. They look to be a well matched pair.
I don't think I'll be switching my Sigma Art 35mm for the Sony though.
Not me, although I don't think there is anything wrong with budget gear to be honest. The gear that works best for you, is all fine by me regardless of cost. I like Sigma because of where they stand on quality/cost, but boy is there ever a size/weight penalty :D
To be honest I don't shoot landscapes, but when I was looking into the 70-300 for motorsports it seemed a lot liked it over the 70-200 f4 for landscapes.
I'd like to say I'd never buy a 70-200 f4, been there done that with Canon, but the smaller size is nice (I might just stick with Fuji though...
I wouldn't even bother with the f4 70-200 for landscapes, the 70-300 would be a better choice.
Like others though I would prefer a lens that covers all the various subjects that I shot. So the 70-200 f2.8 it would have to be.
Fussy eater, another name for hipster surely, it's all the same. I've seen the same for tea. The only time I go to a coffee place is when the young un fancies a treat.
All tea is the same, comes for the same East London council estate, it's all a con :D
Ah okay, you obviously only eat the value versions of every food you eat, and the same for any beer or wine etc. (if that's your fancy) as they all taste the same. Cheap whiskey is the same as expensive whiskey, only hipsters would think otherwise. You'll be telling me you're one of those...
Nothing hip about it all. If you're happy with what you drink, fill your boots. I drink some mainstream stuff from Tesco as well if I've run out of better stuff. It's fine.
Jonny on here even roasts his own beans, I cba to go that far myself!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.