Recent content by mkeeley

Nice to see that you've given them a sense of movement with the panning, all too often they look stationary.

Like #2, would like it even more if it was straight though! I think the Chrysler building is one of the prettiest in NY, not sure about that shot though.

Agree with the comment above.

Nice macaws, shame about the lighting and the background distractions though.

Like that!

The laws of physics apparently don't apply where you were ;) That horizon is epic. Apart from that the beach itself is probably a bit too dark. So straighten the whole thing and try and get some detail in the beach?

Not sure why it isn't here then.

No pic here.

It was a quick test shot, can't remember why, indoors, at night and no flash hence the shallow depth of field. Handheld, 200mm, f4 @ 1/25,(5D Mk2, 70-200 f4 L IS). No pp except for cloning out some food from her beak, messy eater! Considering all that I thought it looked good.

Another of my African Grey, Pooh

#1 and #5 too far away, doesn't look as though you used a polariser either. #1 would have probably been better in landscape although I see what you were hoping for. #5 just too much of nothing interesting on the right and up top, plus a vans bumper. #2 no, #3 no because of the rust and too head...

Funny, thought you were being serious to start with!

Look good, but don't understand why so many people who post on here can't see that their photos aren't straight. So obvious and takes seconds to remedy.

Wasted opportunity, nice car, great backdrop, boring photo.

#1 bit flat and lifeless. #2 yeah, straighten it, amazing how many people don't notice their photos are wonky! Also the "spire" not quite centred. Shame you didn't also centre the gap in the glass. SO basically nothing quite lines up! OK other than that. Would have been better if the triangular...