Pretty please. 
Yesterday evening, I went to the local beach, just to try and put into practice the basics I've learned. I was trying to photograph a small lake, or estuary really. I'm not going to post them up as the results are embarrassing. So there. :razz:
The questions are:
1). I was trying for a slow shutter speed, in order to convey a sense of movement on the water, coupled with a narrow aperture so that all of the pic would be reasonably in focus. No matter how much I tried (very narrow aperture, lowest ISO etc), the light was so bright that I couldn't bring the shutter speed down enough to create the effect without completely overexposing the shot. Are there any tricks / kit that could help with this?
2). Post Processing. How much PP do people use to create some of the stunning images I've seen on here? After tweaking the images back home, I managed to get them to a somewhat acceptable level, but certainly nowhere near good. Should the camera and photographer be doing most of the work, or is it a case that sometimes, both photographer and camera are limited in what they can do?
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Yesterday evening, I went to the local beach, just to try and put into practice the basics I've learned. I was trying to photograph a small lake, or estuary really. I'm not going to post them up as the results are embarrassing. So there. :razz:
The questions are:
1). I was trying for a slow shutter speed, in order to convey a sense of movement on the water, coupled with a narrow aperture so that all of the pic would be reasonably in focus. No matter how much I tried (very narrow aperture, lowest ISO etc), the light was so bright that I couldn't bring the shutter speed down enough to create the effect without completely overexposing the shot. Are there any tricks / kit that could help with this?
2). Post Processing. How much PP do people use to create some of the stunning images I've seen on here? After tweaking the images back home, I managed to get them to a somewhat acceptable level, but certainly nowhere near good. Should the camera and photographer be doing most of the work, or is it a case that sometimes, both photographer and camera are limited in what they can do?
Any help would be very much appreciated.
