- Messages
- 2,407
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
My 5Diii arrived the other day, no light or welcoming weather, so I started comparing high ISO shots indoors with the G9
Both cameras have different advantages, and the 5diii has a definite edge at 12800 and above.
I was very surprised at the performance of both of them at high ISOs, both give very useable pictures at 25600, though the Canon gets batter compared to the G9 as the ISO increases.
I find for some reason, and I can't see why, the Canon RAWs are easier and quicker to develop.
Looking forward to some brighter days to compare in good light.
There were taken this morning long before the sun came up (around 5:30 am), one with the G9 and one with the 5Diii
My surprise comes mainly from the fact that 1600 is very high for me
Both cameras have different advantages, and the 5diii has a definite edge at 12800 and above.
I was very surprised at the performance of both of them at high ISOs, both give very useable pictures at 25600, though the Canon gets batter compared to the G9 as the ISO increases.
I find for some reason, and I can't see why, the Canon RAWs are easier and quicker to develop.
Looking forward to some brighter days to compare in good light.
There were taken this morning long before the sun came up (around 5:30 am), one with the G9 and one with the 5Diii
My surprise comes mainly from the fact that 1600 is very high for me
Last edited: