70-200 f/2.8 VR. Is this normal?

Messages
763
Edit My Images
Yes
I have been doing some tests of my 70-200 and 300 f/2.8's with and without TC's. I have got some results from that and I know what I need to do. However when comparing shots with my 70-200 with NO TC at f/2.8 and f/8 I am a little concerned at the f/2.8 results. Is this sharpness correct?

200mm f/2.8
original.jpg


100% Crop
original.jpg


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

200mm f/8
original.jpg


100% Crop
original.jpg
 
I would have expected optimum sharpness at F8 - F11 anyway ???
 
I would have expected optimum sharpness at F8 - F11 anyway ???

Agree with the above, but i'm not quite sure what your point is here (to OP) they look quite sharp on my monitor, also how do you have your camera set up ie in relation to extra sharpness settings ?
 
Thank god for that I thought I had a problem. I was focusing on the red LG logo. Maybe the bricks look sharper because they show more detail/texture then the white plastic AC unit? I am not too sure.

Anyway thanks guys I can sleep easy tonight!!!
 
Were they shot in raw or .jpg?

If raw and converted to jpg with no sharpening it would look soft.


Remember in camera sharpening does not effect the raw.
 
Were they shot in raw or .jpg?

If raw and converted to jpg with no sharpening it would look soft.


Remember in camera sharpening does not effect the raw.

They were taken in RAW but I applied the same sharpening to all the photos in a batch process.

Can you pull up the photo with the focus point showing like you canon Canon?
Bricks look sharp to me?

Ummmmm not sure if that is possible in PS or Bridge. I know it is in NX but I don't have that installed right now.
 
Back
Top