After some objectivity here....

Messages
1,681
Edit My Images
Yes
Hi all,

I've been here on the forums for some time and I'm always on the look out to improve my photos, technique or gear.

This year I seem to be stepping out of my comfort zone a bit more, doing a bit more wildlife and portrait photography and some weddings too....on top of the landscapes and plane photography I already do alot of...

Now with this context - I've currently got a 5D mk ii and I need a second body. Now I'm torn - do I get a Canon 7D or part exchange some gear I think I can do without and go for a Canon 5D mark III?

Given I'm already lucky enough to have a FF camera - would having a crop body given me more flexibility or am I better off taking the leap and going for the mk III and it being more "future proof"? I don't normally do posts like this as I normally know my own mind but this time I'm genuinely unsure which way to go...

I'm really torn and I would appreciate some opinions on this.....

Ta

Matt
 
I think it really comes down to whether you want the crop of the 7d for wildlife and plane photography ? Otherwise the 5d3 is the better choice if the price is OK ?
 
As much as I love my 5D3 in your shoes doing plane and wildlife photography I'd go for the 7D, or maybe a 1D3, to give you faster AF and higher frame rate than the 5D2 and also a second body for your weddings. Either body will give you a bit more reach out of your lenses for the wildlife and planes too. A 1D3 would be my choice to give you better weathersealing for outside stuff and dual slots for your wedding work.
 
Both - thank you - that's been guiding my thinking to be honest - a backup body but something that gives me a bit more reach too.

What I do know is that the Mk ii isn't suddenly a bad camera with the Mk iii around but I do find I hit the limits on it in certain situations - certainly find the AF 'slow' with planes at times and I have missed that little bit of extra 'reach'...but the Mk iii looks so nice too hence my question :)
 
Back
Top