woof woof
I like a nice Chianti
- Messages
- 39,464
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
ISO 2000? Really?
I really do wonder what and how people who limit themselves to low ISO's such as this shoot. Maybe people don't take pictures in anything but good light or maybe they only shoot static scenes or use flash. Meanwhile in the dim sunlight that passes for daylight in northern England I can sometimes be at ISO 2k+ in daylight never mind true low light and if people friendly shutter speeds and anything more than f1.x zero dof are involved being limited to a max of ISO 2k could result in very few pictures being taken, if any at all.
Limiting yourself to 2k seems like being in the days of film to me but each to their own and if taking a picture that stands any chance of being free from movement blur and stands a chance of having any depth at all means means using ISO's way in excess of 2k I'll happily do it given the abilities modern kit and modern software easily brings
I really do wonder what and how people who limit themselves to low ISO's such as this shoot. Maybe people don't take pictures in anything but good light or maybe they only shoot static scenes or use flash. Meanwhile in the dim sunlight that passes for daylight in northern England I can sometimes be at ISO 2k+ in daylight never mind true low light and if people friendly shutter speeds and anything more than f1.x zero dof are involved being limited to a max of ISO 2k could result in very few pictures being taken, if any at all.
Limiting yourself to 2k seems like being in the days of film to me but each to their own and if taking a picture that stands any chance of being free from movement blur and stands a chance of having any depth at all means means using ISO's way in excess of 2k I'll happily do it given the abilities modern kit and modern software easily brings