Hi All,
I'm a happy owner of a D750 (thanks to this forum's advice months ago) with a 50mm prime. I'd like to get an all-round zoom lens, mainly for my travels.
At the moment I'm torn between these two:
I'm a happy owner of a D750 (thanks to this forum's advice months ago) with a 50mm prime. I'd like to get an all-round zoom lens, mainly for my travels.
At the moment I'm torn between these two:
- AF-S NIKKOR 24-120MM F/4G ED VR (799£ on camerapricebuster, however Amazon has an offer at 742£ and I saw it last week at around 650£)
- AF-S NIKKOR 28-300MM F/3.5-5.6G ED VR (749£ on camerapricebuster)
- Does the 24-120 have VR or VR II? The lens name and Nikon's official site says VR but Amazon and a review by photographylife say VR II (Nikon Amazon photographylife). Other reviews also say VR II.
- Is the 24-120 sharper than the 28-300 or not? I have one review claiming sharper, and one claiming same sharpness (sharper not sharper)
- f4 across the zoom range
- Nano Crystal Coating
- For the moment I don't believe that I need to shoot at focal lengths longer than 120mm
- The 11x zoom for the same price seems more "bangs for the bucks"
- Larger focal range for almost the same size and weight