- Messages
- 8
- Name
- Liz
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I appreciate that this question has been asked thousands of times before, but I wanted to ask my own version of it and have some advice that focused not just on features, but on what's its actually like to use a camera.
I currently own a compact camera and would like to upgrade to something better, so that I can begin to do some more serious photography. At the moment, I'm at the stage of trying to take nice 'snaps' I guess you could say - I've just got back from a long trip abroad and i took lots of fairly standard landscapes, but was attempting to make them interesting. At the moment, I don't want to limit mysekf to any particular photographic genre.
So here's the question: do I get a bridge or a DSLR?
I know that I'm looking for something with potential for plenty of creative control, so it would need to have proper manual/priority modes, something which seems to be the case for many bridges now anyway. The other things I'm looking for are:
- ability to shoot RAW
- viewfinder
- reasonable performance in low light
- I want to be able to do the shallow depth of field blurred background stuff, which I know doesn't work so well with the smaller sensors that bridge cameras have, but I have been able to achieve some sort of Dof effects even on my compact
- ideally it would be cool to be able to use a remote/cable shutter release with it
I'm aware that many of the things that I want are many of the things that bridges seem to lack, but I'm daunted by both the size and expense of DSLRs. If I buy a bridge and decide that I need something more in a few years time, then that's ok, but at the same time, I don't want to restrict myself too much.
So does anyone have any suggestions? I'd really appreciate a few gentle pointers here.
I currently own a compact camera and would like to upgrade to something better, so that I can begin to do some more serious photography. At the moment, I'm at the stage of trying to take nice 'snaps' I guess you could say - I've just got back from a long trip abroad and i took lots of fairly standard landscapes, but was attempting to make them interesting. At the moment, I don't want to limit mysekf to any particular photographic genre.
So here's the question: do I get a bridge or a DSLR?
I know that I'm looking for something with potential for plenty of creative control, so it would need to have proper manual/priority modes, something which seems to be the case for many bridges now anyway. The other things I'm looking for are:
- ability to shoot RAW
- viewfinder
- reasonable performance in low light
- I want to be able to do the shallow depth of field blurred background stuff, which I know doesn't work so well with the smaller sensors that bridge cameras have, but I have been able to achieve some sort of Dof effects even on my compact
- ideally it would be cool to be able to use a remote/cable shutter release with it
I'm aware that many of the things that I want are many of the things that bridges seem to lack, but I'm daunted by both the size and expense of DSLRs. If I buy a bridge and decide that I need something more in a few years time, then that's ok, but at the same time, I don't want to restrict myself too much.
So does anyone have any suggestions? I'd really appreciate a few gentle pointers here.