Buachaille Etive Mor

[SFTPhotography]

_IMG0654 by Stephen Taylor, on Flickr

_IMG0680 by Stephen Taylor, on Flickr

If the colours look washed out - it's because I exported them in aRGB. Plenty browsers now support this colour space but a few still don't.

All taken with the superb Pentax 645z and 28-45

 

[Norkie]

Very nice indeed Steve,

 

[nigpd]

Excellent!

 

[LongLensPhotography]

Combine the two.

 

[WaltonR]

Cracking shots both of them. If I had to pick though, I think Id' go for #1 as I like the layer of sunlight at the foot of the mountain.

 

[mstphoto]

Mines obviously doesn't.
They look a wee bit soft to me

Nice shots all the same
#1 for me

 

[bellzy]

Very nice No1 is my fav , I was there a few weeks ago, the water levels vary so much.

 

[SFTPhotography]

Mines obviously doesn't.
They look a wee bit soft to me

Nice shots all the same
#1 for me

If you don't use a browser that supports aRGB they'll look a little desaturated and washed out. I should really export in sRGB but something is also lost when you do that.

They're not soft. Trust me - all is in focus, front to back and the level of detail would be alien to a full frame shooter. I have applied some sharpening - but only a modest amount to save any artificating that might show - DXO can be quite aggressive in its default sharpening options.

I suspect though the settings for the resizing may not be up to scratch. I'm still new to DXO PL4 and there's various quality settings/tweaks I could make re the export.

Very nice No1 is my fav , I was there a few weeks ago, the water levels vary so much.

Oh yes - no flow over the waterfall when I took this, and the river levels/lakes rise and dip quite noticeably.

 

[Steelo]

Number 1 is the better image for me, better contrast and light.