Indeed, I've no interest in sports, but just knew this was going to be special enough to be worth watching.Big congrats to the women football team.
How many times do you get an outstanding final?I am glad they won, but that has to be one of the worst games of football I have ever seen - bad passing, frequent basic errors, anyone who paid between £200 to £1300 to see that match has more money than sense. England's 4-0 and 8-0 victories were a far higher standard than that game.
How many times do you get an outstanding final?
Majority are cagey affairs often ending with a 1-0 score or decided by penalties.
Perhaps its the fear of losing, possibly nerves, whatever the reason it happens an awful lot.
Great achievement from the players who never gave up and a manager who understands how to use substitutes.
Having watched two seasons of non league with my lot i'm not so sure.It was rubbish for all the reasons I have given, which is bad because their previous games were very good. As far as I am concerned, sport should be entertaining, that game wasn't, it was full of mistakes from both sides. They are professionals. I would imagine that you could regularly go out and see non league men's games far better than that.
I dont like zoe ball, at the best of times,I’m already fed up of hearing about it. The other half has Radio 2 on in the kitchen and Zoe Ball is banging on and on and on about it, and every so often I hear some of that awful song.
Give me a break!
Football is not a sport, it’s a game and in games winning is all that counts, how you do it it unimportant.It was rubbish for all the reasons I have given, which is bad because their previous games were very good. As far as I am concerned, sport should be entertaining, that game wasn't, it was full of mistakes from both sides. They are professionals. I would imagine that you could regularly go out and see non league men's games far better than that.
I am glad they won, but that has to be one of the worst games of football I have ever seen - bad passing, frequent basic errors, anyone who paid between £200 to £1300 to see that match has more money than sense. England's 4-0 and 8-0 victories were a far higher standard than that game.
I do not agree, it was an exciting game by two very equal sides, who were largely able to neutralise each other. However England was able to to take advantage when it mattered most. Both sides change tactics several times. only to be countered by the other team. It was an example to most men's matches, which are usually far less inventive or proactive. When both teams are cutting down the opponents time on the ball far more passes fail to find their targets. but to a large extent England managed to find more space to pass into.It was rubbish for all the reasons I have given, which is bad because their previous games were very good. As far as I am concerned, sport should be entertaining, that game wasn't, it was full of mistakes from both sides. They are professionals. I would imagine that you could regularly go out and see non league men's games far better than that.
At her age, she is no longer a full game player, and more a talisman. And she spends as much time injured as actually playing. No team relies on such a player, however good she might be. It is not at all unusual for them to play without her.tough game, the best German forward was injured on the bench as far as i could tell so probably helped out a lot
She did score both their goals in the semi final so have to think she is quite a vital player for them.At her age, she is no longer a full game player, and more a talisman. And she spends as much time injured as actually playing. No team relies on such a player, however good she might be. It is not at all unusual for them to play without her.
That would demonstrate a team weakness. We had many goal scorers. some more prolific than others, but it makes them far more difficult to mark.She did score both their goals in the semi final so have to think she is quite a vital player for them.
Really, so would that thinking apply to for example Ronaldo then?That would demonstrate a team weakness. We had many goal scorers. some more prolific than others, but it makes them far more difficult to mark.
Though the German goal was as good as they get.
It is a weakness for any team to rely on one player (male or female). While having such outstanding players in top form is clearly an advantage,Really, so would that thinking apply to for example Ronaldo then?
Not sure Real Madrid or their opponents saw it as a weakness.
So very true Marc, the women showed the men how to win and since 1966.
I am glad they won, but that has to be one of the worst games of football I have ever seen - bad passing, frequent basic errors, anyone who paid between £200 to £1300 to see that match has more money than sense. England's 4-0 and 8-0 victories were a far higher standard than that game.
Don’t know anything about football but if U19 refers to age wouldn’t that be boys not menThis sort of thing annoys me - the men won the Euros at the U19 tournament this year too and have won in other years. We have won a number of tournaments since 66.
But not at the top senior level like this. (perhaps they should appoint some women managers.)This sort of thing annoys me - the men won the Euros at the U19 tournament this year too and have won in other years. We have won a number of tournaments since 66.
But not at the top senior level like this. (perhaps they should appoint some women managers.)
This sort of thing annoys me - the men won the Euros at the U19 tournament this year too and have won in other years. We have won a number of tournaments since 66.
Scotland won the U19 Euros, 1982.This sort of thing annoys me - the men won the Euros at the U19 tournament this year too and have won in other years. We have won a number of tournaments since 66.
But, you cannot compare keeping in the Women's game with the men's. Keepers in the men's game can often touch the crossbar without really trying. The women are trying to defend a much larger area, proportionally.the goalkeeping in the tournament has been awful.
Totally agree, I see load of post about how it's the first time we've won anything.This sort of thing annoys me - the men won the Euros at the U19 tournament this year too and have won in other years. We have won a number of tournaments since 66.
But, you cannot compare keeping in the Women's game with the men's. Keepers in the men's game can often touch the crossbar without really trying. The women are trying to defend a much larger area, proportionally.
But, you cannot compare keeping in the Women's game with the men's. Keepers in the men's game can often touch the crossbar without really trying. The women are trying to defend a much larger area, proportionally.
Frankly, I couldn't give a flying posterior release of gas about winning or losing these games.
What impressed both my wife and me was the excellent game play of the girls. The way they kept the German team boxed up in their side of the pitch after the second goal, was a demonstration of how I think the game should be played and their friendly behaviour towards their opponents after the game was a lesson to all.
Some people have graduation ceremonies from kindergartens as well.But the U19s is the top level at that grouping - There are different groups of football, mens senior, mens women and all the teams at U21, U19 etc... groups. Why would you group one or two together and not the others?
.........and the final aside, the goalkeeping in the tournament has been awful.
Totally agree, I see load of post about how it's the first time we've won anything.
We have literally dozens of World and European champions, they just happen to be in sports TV and the media have zero interest in.