OK, I have a question bugging me about how DSLRs and in particular those with cropped sensors work.
I have a Canon 450D, so have a 1.6x crop. I have mainly been using a EF-S kit lens, but have recently diversified into an EF and most recently a Tamron 28-75mm.
Now, I know the EF-S cant be used on a full frame, presumably due to the fact the optics of the EF-S series are optimised for a 1.6x crop. Using a lens like the Tamron which is designed to be used with a full frame, I come across a question I can't answer.
If there is a 1.6x crop, why is this not visible as a difference between what you see through the view finder and the picture itself? I was expecting the image through the view finder to appear wider than the image recorded by the sensor. But in a few shots where I have lined up the image in the viewfinder and find that why I see there is reproduced in the captured image itself pretty nicely.
Maybe this makes no sense to you, because I don't think I follow where the 1.6x crop comes in. The only way I can explain it is that perhaps the viewfinder itself has been optimised for a 1.6x crop? Can anyone shed any light on the matter?
(Sorry for the newbie question, perhaps i should have googled it, but i thought i would throw it open) Thanks
I have a Canon 450D, so have a 1.6x crop. I have mainly been using a EF-S kit lens, but have recently diversified into an EF and most recently a Tamron 28-75mm.
Now, I know the EF-S cant be used on a full frame, presumably due to the fact the optics of the EF-S series are optimised for a 1.6x crop. Using a lens like the Tamron which is designed to be used with a full frame, I come across a question I can't answer.
If there is a 1.6x crop, why is this not visible as a difference between what you see through the view finder and the picture itself? I was expecting the image through the view finder to appear wider than the image recorded by the sensor. But in a few shots where I have lined up the image in the viewfinder and find that why I see there is reproduced in the captured image itself pretty nicely.
Maybe this makes no sense to you, because I don't think I follow where the 1.6x crop comes in. The only way I can explain it is that perhaps the viewfinder itself has been optimised for a 1.6x crop? Can anyone shed any light on the matter?
(Sorry for the newbie question, perhaps i should have googled it, but i thought i would throw it open) Thanks