Just wondering if anyone has owned both a D300 and a Canon 7d? How do their autofocus speeds compare?
I'm thinking of switching to Canon due to the lack of 70-200 f4 (non VR) options with Nikon. I can get a used Canon 70-200 F4 for £450 less than a new Nikon 70-200 f4 VR.
I'm pondering trading my D300 in as part payment on a Canon 70-200 F4 (non IS) and then picking up a used 7d from the classifieds.
Does it sound like a bad idea or not?
Hi,
Short answer: Bad idea. The grass is not greener on the other side.
Long answer:
I'm a portrait photographer so the fastest thing I shoot is running children.
I've had several canon xd and xxd series cameras over the last decade including the 7d and paired with fast glass like the 24-70L f2.8.
A few months ago I found myself frustrated by canons inaccurate AF. Keep in mind that every time I bought a new piece of gear, I'd send all my gear to canon for calibrating together. So this is purely down to af accuracy.
I bought a used d300s and a new Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VR simply to test and see how they performed.
By the end of the month I'd also purchased a Nikon d810 as my main, Nikon 24-120 f4 & Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VRii.
I did thorough testing. The results?
The d300s needed +15 af adjustment on all lenses to bring them into focus. The d810 needed none.
Continuous focus works remarkably well.
When comparing just the number of in/out of focus shots in Lightroom taken at the same aperture & shutter speeds, across 3 canon bodies, Nikon blows canon away. The difference was so absurd that I was furious at myself for having put up with canon for the last decade.
I even took 2 complete camera systems to my next job, but the Nikons performed far better than canon. In more ways than just AF.