- Messages
- 4,289
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
got my Tammy 70-200mm f2.8 this morning and
Hi, I'm thinking about a 70-200 f/2.8 lens for my D90. What is your opinion on the Tammy?
got my Tammy 70-200mm f2.8 this morning and
Just wanted to pop on here and say I got my D90 today.
My first DSLR, so I'm quite excited!
Suggestions on a good book to help me learn how to use it?
Thanks.Well done for buying the best camera in the world
I can recommend two books - well the first one is an ebook:
Thom Hogan's "Complete Guide To The Nikon D90"
Darrel Young's "Mastering The Nikon D90"
Both are excellent value for money. You have to buy Thom's book from him direct, so there's no saving by shopping around but with Darrel's book the prices vary incredibly depending where you look. I think WH Smith is currently the cheapest at £13.
Hi, I'm thinking about a 70-200 f/2.8 lens for my D90. What is your opinion on the Tammy?
Haven't had my D90 long ( a few weeks) and did my first paid job, photographing a baby 2 weeks old. I have posted this elsewhere on the forum but thought I would show a couple of photos in here. I am so far VERY happy with the camera and VERY impressed with its low light ability
These were shot just using natural light inside a house and no tripod
thanks guys much appreciated.
is the nikon sb.400 a good flash?
50mm f1.8 is great for portraits. Not sure what are you missing with that one?
85mm is good for portraits too if you're using Full Frame camera, but since D90 is not one it's just too long.
I'd use 50/1.8 for it has a wide enough Aperture for blurring the background.
I'm using Nikkor 35mm f1.8 for portraits and it's a wonderful lens. It's cheap and works as a 52mm on D90 which is fine for portraits.
I'd say you don't need another lens for what you need, because 50/1.8 should be enough. Or consider this 35/1.8 lens.
Well done for buying the best camera in the world
I can recommend two books - well the first one is an ebook:
Thom Hogan's "Complete Guide To The Nikon D90"
Darrel Young's "Mastering The Nikon D90"
Both are excellent value for money. You have to buy Thom's book from him direct, so there's no saving by shopping around but with Darrel's book the prices vary incredibly depending where you look. I think WH Smith is currently the cheapest at £13.
liking this shot the most.
which lens was that with?
i'd be interested in replies to this as well... obviously would love a VRII, but not sure I can justify the expense, could get a Sigma/Tamron (non-VR) for about £1000 less (which is another secondhand D90 + a 50mm f1.4 + change!)
Great shots John.
As a side note I finally got my hands on a d90 and its seems a whole apart from teh d50
sam
hi Kully
I'd say one major factor in choosing a D90 over a D40/40x/60 for your use is going to be the lowlight capability. the D90 is really strong in this area.
i had a D60 for about a year or so, as my first DSLR... and it was perfect for learning how they work, etc. but I then found myself being limited by what it could do. So I upgraded to a second hand D90 (which you can get for around £500) and it was a brilliant move. I still have it a year on and is a great camera. I also have the Nikon grip for it (which will also make you look the part at the functions!)
you'll also want to budget to buy a flashgun, I'd recommend an SB600, or if you can stretch to it, an SB900.
i appreciate your comments
i dont think low light will be an issue... with that in mind should i consider the 40/40x/60 ? can you still buy them new??
i'd give lowlight some serious thought, i'd imagine if you're going to be shooting black tie events they're primarily going to be in the evening.
the 90 is a world apart from a 40/60x/60 in terms of lowlight, and also flexibility. if you've no experience of DSLRs, then a 40/40x/60 is a perfect entry level camera, but you'll soon find that you are limited by what it can offer and will want to upgrade.
but as you're going into event photography and setting up business, i'd assume you have some experience with DSLRs already, in which case you'll want something just beyond entry level (eg. a d90)
IS THE D90 NOT AS EASY TO USE AS THE OTHER 3
I never owned a DSLR before and it only took at couple of days of getting used to the D90.
i don't know what experience of DSLRs you have, but there are more settings, buttons, customisable bits on a D90, so in essence, no
JUST READ SOME GOOD REVIEWS ON THE D5000.... ANY THOUGHTS?
Kully, no offense meant but you appear to be wanting to set yourself up as a professional but don't want to spend the money to buy a professional camera.
No-one is going to take you seriously if you turn up with an entry level camera ... and yes, there will be someone there that knows the difference
Hi Kully,
Firstly please can I respectfully suggest not using CAPS all the time? It normally indicates the author is shouting at everyone and can inadvertently be taken the wrong way...
Secondly, having myself moved from a D50 to a D90, if you are serious about setting up this venture, I would highly recommend against a camera such as the D5000 as in 12 months you're going to be desperate for new features and will regret it. I certainly did. You end up longing for features you haven't got... As Bristolian says, having buttons for certain features makes it so much easier and is just one tiny selling point of the camera. I have a friend with a 12 month old D40 who also now wants to upgrade as he is looking for more features.
Also, you say photo quality, which I assume you are referring to the style/composition etc, but think also about noise levels, grain, potential for cropping etc.
Regards.
I find it rather bizarre you want to start a job that you have no experience or equipment for.
Why?
It appears that you are basing your purchasing judgement on little more than guesswork
I think the vast majority of users, on this forum, would state that the D40 is not suitable for professional use. By all means, buy one to start learning your photographic trade, but I guarantee that you'll upgrade sooner rather than later.
The D90 is an excellent camera and would not be regarded as "overkill" for professional use.
Ultimately, it's your money, your business, your decision. But if you asking for advice, I'd recommend listening to it and acting on it.
If not, please come back in a few months, so we can all tell you "we told you so"
Have a look at a used D300. TBH it's just as easy to learn as the D40 would be but will grow with your skills and it's also built to last.
The D40 is good but even with the best lens the IQ won't match a D90. 12mp also gives you the ability to crop tighter if you have too.
Don't forget, you'll need a flash of some sort, an SB800 would suffice to start with as indoor events can push even a D3s to the edge.
You also mention no PP. Surely you will be shooting RAW (NEF) to get the best possible results?
How will you trigger the lights?
BUT ISNT THE PROOF IN THE QUAL OF THE PHOTO AND NOT THE CAMERA BEING USED TO CAPTURE THE PHOTO.....
I THINK THE D40 AT 6MP IS SUITABLE FOR BLACKTIE PRINTING AT 6X9... CANT SEE WHY YOU NEED 12 + MP... ITS COMPLETE OVERKILL !!!
AT THE SAME TIME IF A COUPLE OF PEOPLE DO RECOGNISE THAT YOU ARE USING AN ENTRY/MEDIUM RANGE CAMERA THEN I GUESS I LOSE 2 POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS..... IM AWARE OF THE SNOBBISHNESS IN THE PHOTOGRAPHY INDUSTRY BUT THE THE PAYING CUSTOMER IS SURELY PAYING FOR THE QUALITY OF THE PRINTS AND NOT THE SIZE OF THE CAMERA USED
Kully,
As I said, I don't want to rattle your cage but I didn't say the IQ of the D40 wouldn't be good enough ~ I have one as a second body and love it almost as much as the D90 ~ it's the perception your clients (or their guests) will have when they see you using an entry level consumer body. It's nothing to do with snobbishness in the industry but everything to do with client perception ~ bigger is better? You and I know this isn't (necessarily) the case but we're not employing you or buying your pictures, some numpty with a predetermined (incorrect) impression is.
It's not just an issue of Mpx ~ that's the point and shoot camera marketing arguement ~ but you need to consider everything else - low light performance, what lenses you can use, cropability, etc.
Bang for buck you can't beat the D90
Kully, no offense meant but you appear to be wanting to set yourself up as a professional but don't want to spend the money to buy a professional camera.
No-one is going to take you seriously if you turn up with an entry level camera ... and yes, there will be someone there that knows the difference
the question is... am i 'upgrading' to a d90 for business reasons i.e better quality of image delivered in a point and shoot style, or is it because i have a passion for photography and d90 is a camera i would love to explore with??
i know im sticking to my point but i feel its for good reasons..... to clarify what features would i actually need that i wouldnt allready have on a d5000.. (as im pointing and shooting once your lighting is set up), i intend to ply my trade at wedding receptions - from what i have seen you havent got time to do anything but direct the subject (pose) and then shoot and get them to a viewing station as others are waiting to have theirs pics taken.
there will be little (prob non existant) pp involved. cant see why there would be noise or grain as the conditions for my shoot are good as they have been pre determined
there are photographers i have spoken with and they have a successful workflow using d40, d3000 and alike.... im not saying that those cameras and the d5000 are the be and end all.. but i dont want to spend £££ more on a camera which is unnessecary for the job....
have i started to labour the point???
thanks for the earlier comments guys
I dont intend to spend too much time pp,
flash not neccessary as setting up a 3 light system.... but appreciate your comments esp about the IQ
thanks