Cg_Girl
Jamie Oliver's best friend.
- Messages
- 11,487
- Name
- T.
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Ah, you see Nikon is the problem then.
Canon now..... i think i'm the problem, if i actually spent time reading maybe i'd learn
Ah, you see Nikon is the problem then.
Canon now..... i think i'm the problem, if i actually spent time reading maybe i'd learn
You can read? Wow!!!!
Complete and utter bookworm me... want me to teach you sweets
I don't think there's any question tbh, the D750 is better than the 6D in every way apart from costRight now I'm trying to convince myself that a Nikon D750 would be better than my Canon 6D. Keep an eye out in the D750 owners thread, I'll be there soon.
I don't think there's any question tbh, the D750 is better than the 6D in every way apart from cost
Well it depends what you mean by "better". The seeing eye is, of course, the first thing you need. Can't see the photo then no photo. On the other hand, try shooting surfers form a beach without a long lens ... I think the term "better" is the problem. It can get you shots, new gear, that you simply couldn't get before.I'm 72 or 73 I'm not sure, been at this nonsense for over 50 years.
The 'very' best amateur photographer I have ever come across was an old
guy at a PS I used to belong to in Essex back in the day.
He had an old Praktica, a 50mm lens and a Weston meter, he shot everything on transparencies, slides that is......we only had 36 exposures remember, the exposure had to be right.
Ninety per cent of his shots were fabulous.
It's the 'seeing-eye' that counts, not what one puts up to it to peer through.
'NEW GEAR will make one a better photographer' is a cop-out.....'NO WAY'