Digital images contain their maker's mark

Messages
231
Name
Fred Dawson LRPS
Edit My Images
Yes
Looks like typical weak technical journalism from New Scientist to me. A 90% probability of correctly identifying the right model of camera. It's not going to be a great help. I reckon most images will have that data in the EXIF already!
 
If they were really smart they would read my name, website and copyright info from the EXIF ;)

I love this:

Pollitt believes that this technique can still be used forensically. He says that because digital cameras have a shelf life of only 18 months, this can help to narrow down when and where it was sold.

18 months? He's having a laugh. I wish I could replace my cameras every 18 months.
 
Camera serial numbers are written to EXIF - what else do they need?
 
18months.............

The way photography's gone in the last 18 months how many, say, D40's or EoS 400D's etc have been sold. Doesn't narrow it down that much does it.

I can imagine Poirot now "so we have a Nikon D40 as exhibit no. 1...hmmmmmm, get me the list of 1.5m people who have one of those... I want a fit on each of them by 8pm"

If they're going to write a technical article about photography, they could at least get someone to write it who knows the different between a camera and a cow's ar$e.
 
It's easy enough to narrow it down to 50/50 anyway.....bad picture, Nikon.....good picture, Canon ;) :lol:
 
Should be called The Ancient Scientist! :D
 
Can't see much difference between this and the way colour laser printers print a microdot containing traceable information on each print they produce.
 
I think some scientist had way to much time on his hands .
 
Can I have my 30 seconds back please.
 
Back
Top