What are you using at the moment, what do you photograph and what challenges are you facing? I don’t think anyone can help you with this question without knowing more.Do I persevere with buying a Canon R6 mark III, RF24-105mm F4L IS USM and a RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM or another camera set up?

Well anything, just general photography, but not glamour or studio. I use a telephoto zoom for aircraft, boats or distant subjects.What are you using at the moment, what do you photograph and what challenges are you facing? I don’t think anyone can help you with this question without knowing more.
Unfortunately that's what it costs these days, or more?If you're spending that sort of money on equipment. You shouldn't need to ask others what to buy![]()
Unfortunately that's what it costs these days, or more?
I didn't exactly ask what is the best kit but your reply more or less sums up all the replies I have had for my recent posts.If you ask 99 photographers what kit is "best", you'll get 101 answers and lectures in physics. There's no right or wrong.
No you asked;I didn't exactly ask what is the best kit but your reply more or less sums up all the replies I have had for my recent posts.
Which is a question absolutely no one in the world can answer.Do I persevere with buying a Canon R6 mark III, RF24-105mm F4L IS USM and a RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM or another camera set up?
Mostly autofocus, slow shutter speeds and flat looking light.

I as I'm aware I haven't complained about anyone's reply, however I have agreed with a previous poster's summary, sorry if that appears to be a complaint.
I'm sorry but my finances, family and wellbeing are my private affairs and I feel they don't have any bearing on the post.
As to vague detail, all I need is a camera body, a general all round versatile main lens (unfortunately a zoom) and a telephoto zoom (min 100mm, max 300mm plus)
I have posted previous threads as to why I had to return what I bought but to recap, the R6 III and RF24-105L lens was bought new from Canon online store. It is being return because I paid for a new camera and received a second-hand one. The RF100-500L lens had a very noticeable lump of dust on the inside of the front element , quite close to the centre. For what it all cost I found it unacceptable. I have bought filters and spare battery for the R6.
What I had before was a Canon 700D, EF100-400mm L lens, Sony a77 II and a Tamron 18-270mm which covered my needs.
I surprised that Phil V seems to be the only one for FF. 4/3rds and crop sensors may have some advantages? Technology moves on and all I'm trying to do is upgrade my older equipment, for example the Canon EF100-400 mm series 1 lens.
It's just a hobby for me.
You’ve completely misunderstood my posts.I surprised that Phil V seems to be the only one for FF. 4/3rds and crop sensors may have some advantages?
Right, but I hate mounting screws with a hammer...Mind you, as a very old proverb tells us: "a bad workman blames his tools".![]()
the R6 III and RF24-105L lens was bought new from Canon online store. It is being return because I paid for a new camera and received a second-hand one. The RF100-500L lens had a very noticeable lump of dust on the inside of the front element , quite close to the centre
This is true.For everything there is an optimum, and then you need to make compromises.
If the picture is good, then it is the person.This is true.
The trick, I have found, is to know when it's the camera that's the problem or the person holding it.
This may well be so.If the picture is good, then it is the person.
This, on the other hand, is merely one possibility but on the whole I'd suggest that this is also the fault of the person.If the picture is crap, then it is because the camera does not have precapture, the lens is too short and the tripod too wobbly.

Something I often think when I see award winning images at the Natural History Museum wildlife photography competition.This may well be so.
This, on the other hand, is merely one possibility but on the whole I'd suggest that this is also the fault of the person.
Bear in mind, though, that one person's great song is another person's horrible noise and a similar dichotomy can be applied to photographic images...![]()
The camera was bought new from the official Canon online store but by looking at it I could tell that it wasn't a brand new camera, that was the problem.Was there also a problem with the camera? Apologies if I have missed an earlier post.
Did you try the combination even if there was dust?
UK based stores - WEX, LCE (London Camera Exchange), Park Cameras.Any recommendations for "new" camera equipment dealers?
Another 'what kit is right for me thread'!Do I persevere with buying a Canon R6 mark III, RF24-105mm F4L IS USM and a RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM or another camera set up?
And those three do used kit so you might be able to save a bit or look at systems that they do not stock new in any depth, the more you can handle the better placed you will be to make a good decision.
Not really and it wasn't meant to be. I already had made my decision all I was asking was do I go with my initial decision.Another 'what kit is right for me thread'!
Really only you can decide.
Actually taking the time and trouble to try some of the options first hand rather than consulting the opinions of others on the internet is likely to be a whole lot more instructive.
...
Ok the thread might not had been crystal clear...
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I’d still recommend a Canon test drive to help you decideAny recommendations for "new" camera equipment dealers?
You can take a horse to water....At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I’d still recommend a Canon test drive to help you decide
This thread was a follow on from my previous threads, I didn't want to constantly repeat those threads.You have certainly mastered understatement!!!
Surely keeping the discussion in a single thread would be neater and clearer?This thread was a follow on from my previous threads, I didn't want to constantly repeat those threads.