- Messages
- 653
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I am so glad the BBC (and therefore every licence payer) is no longer funding these 3 and their pet producer.
It would be far, far better if we didn't have the BBC and the unfair tax to fund it
I am so glad the BBC (and therefore every licence payer) is no longer funding these 3 and their pet producer.
The BBC is the envy of the world.It would be far, far better if we didn't have the BBC and the unfair tax to fund it
It's unfair as we have no choice when it comes to paying the license fee. We can't opt out of BBC channels in order to avoid the fee.The BBC is the envy of the world.
How is it 'unfair'?
Who uses no BBC services?It's unfair as we have no choice when it comes to paying the license fee. We can't opt out of BBC channels in order to avoid the fee.
Good for you. I'm not.Who uses no BBC services?
I'm currently watching the Beeb, during a break from processing, at the processing PC I have the radio on (BBC) and I'm keeping up to date with the football scores on the BBC website.
Why can't we just have a choice?The other thing is that it is all very well to say that you don't want to fund the BBC but one also needs to consider the alternatives.
A strong publicly funded media outlet, (largely) free from political influence is one of the benchmarks of a free press society and without question a free press is more valuable than many people give it credit for.
If everything is private then you end up with a system like America which is full of adverts and massive political bias, so much so that it takes an hour to watch a 28 minute sitcom and most of the media is so skewed it's difficult to know what to believe.
Alternatively you could have much more state funded media, but we don't really want that or you end up like Russia, and I'm pretty sure no one wants that.
Lastly, even if you don't consume BBC media (although I'm pretty sure most people do) it is easy to overlook the levels of innovation that has led how we consume media across the whole sector and also they provided an even keel such that we can still, more or less, get political opinion from and part of the spectrum. Those things are easy to take for granted but don't happen by magic.
....so much so that it takes an hour to watch a 28 minute sitcom......
Why can't we just have a choice?
If you watch USA programmes or programmes made for the USA market, they have many more breaks built into the structure of the programme than we use in the UK.How do you figure that?
Sitcoms in a half hour time slot on commercial channels are actually around 22 minutes in programme length because ad breaks are factored in when they're made.
If you watch USA programmes or programmes made for the USA market, they have many more breaks built into the structure of the programme than we use in the UK.
Why should I have to give up my TV though?You have the same choice we do: we have no TV, don't pay a license fee, watch movies on Amazon and as of this past Sept don't use iPlayer. Could you not get most of the content you want via steaming? The commercial channels seem pretty happy to stream content in exchange for our email address and showing adverts.
ATM I still use the BBC weather and news sites because AFAIK they are free for all users, plus Radio 4 because I like to live a little dangerously.![]()
You have a choice, and you're choosing to use their services.Why should I have to give up my TV though?
I'm not anti BBC and do use their services, although not much, and therefore pay my licence fee, but I feel that we should have a choice.
I have sky but we don't watch any BBC shows. But I'm not able to disable and not have them in my house and save the £120 a year. So it's not actually a choice unless I get rid of skyYou have a choice, and you're choosing to use their services.
I choose not to have Sky, I don't pay for it. I choose to use the BBC and Virgin and Amazon, and I pay to use them.
Some people above have chosen not to use the BBC and don't pay them, I don't understand the confusion.
Well that'll be to make sure the BBC can afford to pay Murdoch to carry the channels. In a complete reversal of the normal relationship between carriers and channels.I have sky but we don't watch any BBC shows. But I'm not able to disable and not have them in my house and save the £120 a year. So it's not actually a choice unless I get rid of sky
You didn't have to get rid of your TV because you chose not to use sky.You have a choice, and you're choosing to use their services.
I choose not to have Sky, I don't pay for it. I choose to use the BBC and Virgin and Amazon, and I pay to use them.
Some people above have chosen not to use the BBC and don't pay them, I don't understand the confusion.
I'm not confused.You didn't have to get rid of your TV because you chose not to use sky.
If someone chosen not to watch the BBC to avoid the fee, they have to get rid of the TV.
It's not rocket science. Where's the confusion?
Neither am I.I'm not confused.
![]()
I don't listen to radio I mainly listen to music from my past on CD.Well that'll be to make sure the BBC can afford to pay Murdoch to carry the channels. In a complete reversal of the normal relationship between carriers and channels.
BTW I genuinely don't believe you watch, listen to, read no BBC content.
A strong publicly funded media outlet, (largely) free from political influence
And with that we're already a million miles away from the BBC. If they matched that description I'd be happy to pay. Every state has it's propaganda, fine, I get that. I DO resent having to PAY for it though. At least in other countries it's free (well, from general taxation), but it's somehow extra painful having to cough up separately for that......(largely) free from political influence.....
That is true if you have receiving equipment then you have to pay.I always thought the licence was for having a receiver not paying specifically for the BBC. In the far off days of my childhood we lived in a flat and had indoor aerials, one for each of the two available channels.
No option to get rid of the BBC one thus avoiding the licence fee, seem to recall also needing a radio licence if you didn't have a television
That is true if you have receiving equipment then you have to pay.
Are you sure about this?
The following is taken from http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk.
'You don’t need a TV Licence if you:
This could be on any device, including a TV, desktop computer, laptop, mobile phone, tablet, games console, digital box or DVD/VHS recorder'.
- never watch or record programmes on any channel as they’re being shown on TV or live on an online TV service, and
- never download or watch BBC programmes on iPlayer – live, catch up or on demand.
The bold highlighting is mine. FWIW, we do not have TV.
I'm reasonably sure that andyscott *was* correct at one time: use of radio transmitting and receiving equipment all used to require licensing. Over the years there has been de-regulation, and now it's about what you receive and process, rather than equipment owned and used, hence if you have a B&W TV you may watch programs but not record them because recording is always in colour (conversion to mono is done locally by the TV set - this is a throwback to the old regs relating to equipment owned - it makes no sense to charge less for watching in B&W).
I also note that a license isn't required to listen to radio now.
As I understand it, it changed just as the students were going back to uni, to stop them from watching on lap tops etc ...The rules changed on Sept 1 2016.
If you watch BBC catchup on any device you need a licence...a loophole they had long sought to close.
Oh of course.As I understand it, it changed just as the students were going back to uni, to stop them from watching on lap tops etc ...
Purely coincidental no doubt![]()
I am correct in thinking that a Hotel still only needs one TV Licence even if it has a hundred rooms ?
Bringing this thread back on topic, it appears each episode of The Grand Tour contains a joke with reference to where the tent/studio is sighted. This particular episode was in Finland and Hammonds joke was majing reference to a Finnish ice cream advert.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Dyjq8jSFQ
So do we now need a new thread asking if people from Finland have a sense of humour?..............Bringing this thread back on topic, it appears each episode of The Grand Tour contains a joke with reference to where the tent/studio is sighted. This particular episode was in Finland and Hammonds joke was majing reference to a Finnish ice cream advert.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Dyjq8jSFQ
Puts a whole new perspective on it, does thatThis particular episode was in Finland and Hammonds joke was majing reference to a Finnish ice cream advert.
Yes. It all makes so much sense now.Puts a whole new perspective on it, does that![]()
Puts a whole new perspective on it, does that![]()