- Messages
- 3,389
- Edit My Images
- Yes
My new one does, It doese'nt bother me, in fact I find it quite reassuring, I know its working.
The whirring is like that on my OM-D M5 only quieter.
I have had a number of 16-85's, yes plural, on a number of D7000's, yes again plural, either owned or on appro.
Glutton for punishment :bang:
I can honestly say that I have never heard a 16-85 whirring before.
The lens is fitted to my new D300s, would that perhaps make a difference.
Also, much to my amazement/joy the IQ of JPG's OOC is superb, I never had anything anywhere near as good with a D7000/16-85 combination, especially hand held.
I have now at last, got from a Nikon a combination that I have been searching for since I went DSLR.....over 2 years ago.
D300s
New camera/new lens, I just went out into the garden a snapped away, paying no particular attention to tecnique or settings.
Hand held, JPG, OOC, A/P, 1/125 @ f7.1

DSC_0017RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
The whirring is like that on my OM-D M5 only quieter.
I have had a number of 16-85's, yes plural, on a number of D7000's, yes again plural, either owned or on appro.
Glutton for punishment :bang:
I can honestly say that I have never heard a 16-85 whirring before.
The lens is fitted to my new D300s, would that perhaps make a difference.
Also, much to my amazement/joy the IQ of JPG's OOC is superb, I never had anything anywhere near as good with a D7000/16-85 combination, especially hand held.
I have now at last, got from a Nikon a combination that I have been searching for since I went DSLR.....over 2 years ago.
D300s
New camera/new lens, I just went out into the garden a snapped away, paying no particular attention to tecnique or settings.
Hand held, JPG, OOC, A/P, 1/125 @ f7.1

DSC_0017RS by Dave in Wales, on Flickr
Last edited: