Evaluating The Canon 2X TC

  • Thread starter Thread starter CT
  • Start date Start date

CT

TPer Emeritus
Messages
26,617
Edit My Images
Yes
Some thoughts about the 2X TC having been doing some objective testing with it for a few days on both the 7D and 50D with the 300mm 2.8L IS

The first thing to be said is that no matter how well you nail the focus, the effect on IQ at pixel level (full image size or 1:1) is obvious, as we should really expect. However, that's not really the full story - at reduced image sizes the converter is capable of producing some excellent results.

Both shots with the 7D, 300mm 2.8L IS and 2XTC, 800 ISO

4337972359_b8d76310c6_o.jpg


4337972811_a85642b2cf_o.jpg


4337973167_4049dcd4ee_o.jpg


4338715980_22222b3307_o.jpg


The real problems come as the shooting range increases, particularly when the subject is a small bird, when the !Q loss due to the converter and the ability even of cameras like the 7D and 50D to continue resolving detail have a real adverse impact on the usability of images.

The combination will never match the quality of the 500mm or 500mm with 1.4X TC when you're really pushing the shooting distance. Having said that, if you can fill the frame, keep to moderate cropping, and don't get overly ambitious with shooting distances, it's capable of some remarkably good results.

I'd certainly not think twice about replacing mine if anything happened to it.
 
Here's an MTF comparison with and without the converter on the 300/2.8 IS. Whilst the graphs may be arbitary, they do provide a reasonable idea of percentage losses in detail across the frame.
Bob

300/2.8 IS solo performance
300_MTF.jpg


300/2.8 IS with EF2xII (left) and EF2x (original version) right

300_2xMTF.jpg
 
Back
Top