- Messages
- 8,193
- Name
- Pat MacInnes
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Dream car for me still - in black too....mmmmmm, so 1980s
Interior/details shots don't do anything for me; flash is too bare, too direct and it's all a bit too much 'one-light' and stark for my liking. Some diffusion, especially on the gloss surfaces, would help bring these as important as the exterior shots.
The difference between 12 and 13 is massive; flash on 12 just lifts the interior and helps bring it out against the ambient..... in 13 the lighting is flat and it just looks like a head-on shot took with a telephoto.
I like the lighting on 10, but feel that front bumper is just hiding too much of the front wheel; moving round a little bit more would, for me, work better compositionally. I don't like the crop as it is but could quite easily see that space being used by a designer to lay text over in a magazine context.
4-9 just don't have it for me I'm afraid; light is not controlled and there are too many large areas of reflection that don't look intentional in the same way pumping some OCF into the shot would. The background isn't to my taste either; something that shouts 1980s (skyscrapers? glass?) would be worth a crack.
I get a bit fed up seeing rig shots these days, especially when they're used on totally uninspiring cars, but I like these; don't know whether it's the lighting or just the fact that this reminds me so much of posters I had on my wall
Interior/details shots don't do anything for me; flash is too bare, too direct and it's all a bit too much 'one-light' and stark for my liking. Some diffusion, especially on the gloss surfaces, would help bring these as important as the exterior shots.
The difference between 12 and 13 is massive; flash on 12 just lifts the interior and helps bring it out against the ambient..... in 13 the lighting is flat and it just looks like a head-on shot took with a telephoto.
I like the lighting on 10, but feel that front bumper is just hiding too much of the front wheel; moving round a little bit more would, for me, work better compositionally. I don't like the crop as it is but could quite easily see that space being used by a designer to lay text over in a magazine context.
4-9 just don't have it for me I'm afraid; light is not controlled and there are too many large areas of reflection that don't look intentional in the same way pumping some OCF into the shot would. The background isn't to my taste either; something that shouts 1980s (skyscrapers? glass?) would be worth a crack.
I get a bit fed up seeing rig shots these days, especially when they're used on totally uninspiring cars, but I like these; don't know whether it's the lighting or just the fact that this reminds me so much of posters I had on my wall
Last edited: