- Messages
- 8,118
- Name
- Mark Molloy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have been thinking about a long lens for a while now but not sure if it would be right for me or not, just looking for opinions.
Profile-
Im photographing birds and wildlife and quite often smaller type of birds.
I walk about most of the time and seldom static.
Im usually out for about 5 or 6hrs carrying a lens and camera which can get quite heavy over that period of time.
My current camera and lens is the D300 with the Sigma 120-300 and added 1.4TC which can be a bit limiting for distance at times but is nice and quick and good in low light without the TC.
I often find myself cropping pics just now.
I can sometimes get a sore back because the lens and camera around my neck but can cope most of the time.
I like the idea of a longer lens and maybe even with VR but not necessary.
I really dont want to go much heavier than just now
I seldom use my monopod or tripod.
Im thinking of around 500/600mm Nikon either the AFS II or VR versions.
Whats your opinions on both the above lenses, are they ok to handhold.
Profile-
Im photographing birds and wildlife and quite often smaller type of birds.
I walk about most of the time and seldom static.
Im usually out for about 5 or 6hrs carrying a lens and camera which can get quite heavy over that period of time.
My current camera and lens is the D300 with the Sigma 120-300 and added 1.4TC which can be a bit limiting for distance at times but is nice and quick and good in low light without the TC.
I often find myself cropping pics just now.
I can sometimes get a sore back because the lens and camera around my neck but can cope most of the time.
I like the idea of a longer lens and maybe even with VR but not necessary.
I really dont want to go much heavier than just now
I seldom use my monopod or tripod.
Im thinking of around 500/600mm Nikon either the AFS II or VR versions.
Whats your opinions on both the above lenses, are they ok to handhold.