1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. It is with deepest regret that we announce the passing of one of our long-standing members, Gary Coyle.
    Many visitors will recognise both his work as a sports photographer, and his name as a prominent community member. He registered with Talk Photography back in 2006, not long after the start of the site and has been a regular contributor since.

    It goes without saying that Gary will be sorely missed by many members, and his passing is a huge loss to the photography community.

    Our thoughts are with his family at this time.

    Funeral details :
    Dewsbury Crematorium
    Tuesday 13th September 2016 at 2pm.
    Afterwards at Batley IDLC (Batley Nash).
    All welcome.


    There is also a discussion thread here if anyone wishes to add their own thoughts.

    The Mod Team

    Dismiss Notice
  1. mjd611

    mjd611

    Messages:
    56
    Name:
    Matt
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I discovered this rolleiflex whilst helping mum clear out her loft (a never ending job it would seem). It belonged to either Great Aunt Bea or to a photographer my parents knew who gave it to them when he moved abroad (we need to find the other one to identify whos is whos).
    Anyway back on topic, I'm interested to know a little more about it. Its serial number is 1026373 which i believe dates it to around the early 40s and it would be an automat model 2,3 or 4.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    I quite fancy getting the camera working again and was wondering what people suggest; service or just stick some film in and see what happens? With regards service i have read about Newton Ellis, Brian Mickleboro and Sendean in London, any thoughts?

    Thanks for your help
     
  2. freecom2

    freecom2

    Messages:
    5,700
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Almost certainly an Automat, with a Tessar. A fine camera. Take a closer look through the lenses - at least from here on the picture, the taking lens in particular (the one at the bottom) looks pretty gungy - or is that just the picture? Mechanically they were supremely well built, you might actually be okay to run a film through it.

    Heard good things about the first two, and they are both quite Rollei orientated - I'd avoid Sendean, they are overpriced (if you are going to pay through the nose, send it to someone who is renowned for Rollei work!) all things considered.

    Also, I don't know if it's just the picture but in the second image the Rollei is leaning forwards. This is often because the feet/bottom part of the hinged case are bent inwards, and often because the camera has been dropped. Whilst they were tough, this can cause the lenses to become out of alignment and would most likely require some work to correct.
     
  3. joxby

    joxby

    Messages:
    7,356
    Name:
    John
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Looks like an Automat, I have been unable to find one with that two pin socket for a positive ID
     

Share This Page