I have a couple of bags that fit.
The Crumpler Jimmy-bo 400 and the Manfrotto on the left. I have to be careful about recommending the Manfrotto as I think there must be several that look similar, but are different sizes.
A friend of mine saw mine and asked if the one she was looking at online was the same one. I thought it was, (I didn’t have mine with me) but when it turned up it was tiny.
Anyway, the code inside mine says MB SH-66B.
Personally, I prefer using the Manfrotto as the opening is bigger (as is the bag) so I think it’s easier to get the camera in and out.
That said, I don’t tend to use the bags in this way as I carry my cameras on sling straps.
For the record though, the Manfrotto allowed me to fit in my RX10, a Godox TT330, a double battery charger for the camera, spare batteries for the flash and a plug in charger for the flash batteries.
Here’s how they look.
View attachment 387434
Thanks for the suggestions, I'll look those up.I use a Think Tank MirrorlessMover 30i on the basis that, if I can't fit it in then I'm carrying too much. This is an old photo so it's got my RX10M3, HVL-F43M and a tabletop tripod. At the moment it's got my OM-5 with 12-100mm and a bottle of water.
View attachment 387445
Why not Jeff - they’re fairly similar I’d have thought?This thread always amuses me, there is no way you can compare the FZ1000 to an RX10
Well I wouldn't go that far but I agree it is the best of the bunch from what I can seeThe only similarity between the FZ1000 and the RX10 is they are both called bridge cameras, the RX10 is by far the better camera I would even say it's in a class of its own.
Whos compared the fz1000 to the rx10, have I missed something?This thread always amuses me, there is no way you can compare the FZ1000 to an RX10
Thanks AlbyThose last couple of shots are great Mike
Only if you're talking about the RX10 IV. The focussing and possibly zoom speed of the FZ1000 are much better than the first two or even three RX10s.The only similarity between the FZ1000 and the RX10 is they are both called bridge cameras, the RX10 is by far the better camera I would even say it's in a class of its own.
Sorry don't see it, It just lists a couple of high end bridge cameras to suggest the type of things one might be interested in. I find very little between my RX10 iv, RX100 vii and FZ2000 if I'm honest.Whos compared the fz1000 to the rx10, have I missed something?
Just look at the title of this thread...
Thanks Alby, yes, the Small Copper is a real beauty, but i dont see enough of them each season, its a butterfly i have to really search for, but worth it.Super photo Paul, the small copper is my favourite butterfly.
Excellent! Look forward to seeing what you can do with it!Just picked up a new to me RX10iv.
It's mint. Can't wait to get out and about with it......
Just picked up a new to me RX10iv.
It's mint. Can't wait to get out and about with it......
The second one is awesome. Do you use a close up lens/adapter?A couple of Beautiful Demoiselle taken with the Sony rx10 iv today.
Calopteryx virgo - Female by Ajophotog, on Flickr
Calopteryx virgo - Male by Ajophotog, on Flickr
No Bob not with these, I just cropped a little.The second one is awesome. Do you use a close up lens/adapter?
Three from the Sony RX10 iv taken at Exbury Gardens in the New Forest.
Rhododendron-5 by Ajophotog, on Flickr
Rhododendron-2 by Ajophotog, on Flickr
Rhododendron-3 by Ajophotog, on Flickr
Some excellent details resolved from that distance George."Trawler Nets"
I said I'd try and start using my RX10M4 again, well this pic' was snapped from the other side of The Harbour at the 600mm setting F4.5 hand held with a bit of cropping. Nothing special but I was quite pleased with the detail etc.
RX10M4
Trawler Nets-03766Cip by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr