Some of the other shots I got were properly gruesome - didn't look like a great way to goYou can see the poor pigeons face under its wing. The good thing about nature is nothing goes to waste.
Those raw or jpg Mike ?
Hi Jeff - I’m still on jpeg (until Photoshop elements 2027 comes out with the raw converter update - this should be coming soon). I’ve read in a few places that the jpeg noise reduction is really heavy handed so will hopefully get some better results once able to use RAW files. CheersThose raw or jpg Mike ?
Hi Jeff - I’m still on jpeg (until Photoshop elements 2027 comes out with the raw converter update - this should be coming soon). I’ve read in a few places that the jpeg noise reduction is really heavy handed so will hopefully get some better results once able to use RAW files. Cheers
Hi George. Just on jpeg for the Mk5 as the version of Adobe Camera RAW which comes with Photoshop Elements has not been updated yet. CheersHi Mike, excuse my ignorance, but are you saying all of your pic's from the Mk4 & Mk5 are snapped on jpeg? If so I'm surprised at the very high quality you get from your presentations. I've never ever shot jpeg files not even on my iPhone, so I really must commend you on the quality of your pic's.

Unfortunately not - sold 'old faithful' on eBay a couple of weeks ago. I've been shooting bees and butterflies etc which are coming out nicely but the back focussing only becomes apparent when the focus distance is a bit longer (eg 7 meters for the test shot above) so I thought all was welldo you still have the mk4 to compare with?
I’m not certain but I believe they can recalibrate it - it’ll need to go somewhere for that to be done. I’ve emailed Cotswolds to trigger a warranty claim.Will it need to go back Mike, or are they releasing a firmware update to sort it?
Cheers mate - it’s a bit of a pain but we’ll get thereHi Mike sorry you have woes with the new camera, hope you can get it sorted mate.
Your work so far has been lovely as usual - good luck
As usual your shots on Flikr are excellent and the MK5 is certainly great
hopefully you can get a quick turnaround Mike.Cheers mate - it’s a bit of a pain but we’ll get there
Cheers - it's off to AJ Johnstone tomorrow morning (funnily enough that's where my A6700 went for the exactly same issuehopefully you can get a quick turnaround Mike.

If it is a known issue you may get it back quicker then you think Mike, I'll keep my fingers crossed for you.Cheers - it's off to AJ Johnstone tomorrow morning (funnily enough that's where my A6700 went for the exactly same issue). I don't think it's going to be quick though and they may not be able to fix it at all so I might buy back a Mk4 to keep me going
![]()
CheersIf it is a known issue you may get it back quicker then you think Mike, I'll keep my fingers crossed for you.
I'd be demanding a refund as it's clearly not of merchantable quality. This is a design fault so don't see how AJ Johnstone can fix it ?Cheers - it's off to AJ Johnstone tomorrow morning (funnily enough that's where my A6700 went for the exactly same issue). I don't think it's going to be quick though and they may not be able to fix it at all so I might buy back a Mk4 to keep me going
![]()
Well it’s a fault for sure I’m not sure about a design fault as the issue doesn’t seem to affect all of them. I was outwith the return period so a warranty claim seemed to be my only option- if they can’t fix it then it’s a whole new ball game of course. CheersI'd be demanding a refund as it's clearly not of merchantable quality. This is a design fault so don't see how AJ Johnstone can fix it ?
I’ve seen that, TBH to me the chart doesn’t look that bad, maybe a tad back focused but I’m sure you know in the old days the DOF on DSLR’s should be 1/3rd front and 2/3rd back in focus. I had a quick look on your Flickr, the M5 photos are top draw, before looking at the FB furore did you notice an IQ difference between the M4 & M5? I intend to upgrade to a M5 from my M4 soon but now have slightly been put off. Good luck with your fixed M5.There's something of a furore on the RX10v Facebook group with a suspected back-focussing issue which seems to affect some of the cameras. So I bought a chart and did a test - result as below. I think it looks like I've got a duffer, any thoughts please Ladies and Gents?
Sony RX10v back focusby Mike Smith, on Flickr
Hi Ronin. Well on Fb there are some very knowledgable togs bickering about this (one bunch convinced there is an issue, the other bunch saying it's user error) but I'm pretty convinced there is an issue with my camera (again according to others who have worked it out there should be a 50/50 split for this lens and sensor). The issue doesn't manifest on close up shots so ignore them - you need something from around 7 meters to show it up on the test chart anyway. I've tried a few bird shots which I just know my Mk4 would have nailed and they are definitely not as sharp as they should be with my Mk5 so I would struggle to recommend the upgrade right now I'm afraid. I'm sure it'll be fixed in due time and the people who have got a good one are loving it and getting great results but maybe just wait a bit? CheersI’ve seen that, TBH to me the chart doesn’t look that bad, maybe a tad back focused but I’m sure you know in the old days the DOF on DSLR’s should be 1/3rd front and 2/3rd back in focus. I had a quick look on your Flickr, the M5 photos are top draw, before looking at the FB furore did you notice an IQ difference between the M4 & M5? I intend to upgrade to a M5 from my M4 soon but now have slightly been put off. Good luck with your fixed M5.
Mike, if you’re series about getting hold another M4 get in touch. I use the M4 as a secondary camera for holidays abroad etc so it’s no big deal not having a RX10 for a while.Hi Ronin. Well on Fb there are some very knowledgable togs bickering about this (one bunch convinced there is an issue, the other bunch saying it's user error) but I'm pretty convinced there is an issue with my camera (again according to others who have worked it out there should be a 50/50 split for this lens and sensor). The issue doesn't manifest on close up shots so ignore them - you need something from around 7 meters to show it up on the test chart anyway. I've tried a few bird shots which I just know my Mk4 would have nailed and they are definitely not as sharp as they should be with my Mk5 so I would struggle to recommend the upgrade right now I'm afraid. I'm sure it'll be fixed in due time and the people who have got a good one are loving it and getting great results but maybe just wait a bit? Cheers
ok will do - I am considering various options at presentMike, if you’re series about getting hold another M4 get in touch. I use the M4 as a secondary camera for holidays abroad etc so it’s no big deal not having a RX10 for a while.
It's a real disappointment I am sure, but your work with your 'old' MK4 was brilliant tooCheers mate - it’s a bit of a pain but we’ll get there
Cheers - well I need to get the Mk5 sorted anyway so I’m still hoping that will be my main camera in the long run, I just need something to keep me going in the meantimeIt's a real disappointment I am sure, but your work with your 'old' MK4 was brilliant too
So maybe another MK4 would suit you better?

Thanks Alby - very much hoping it can be fixed as the sharp shots I got with it were greatThat shot has a super background to show off the butterfly to its best. Really good image Mike.