- Messages
- 2,249
- Name
- Lee
- Edit My Images
- No
Last edited:
Lee, does the image go any higher up, so you can include the tops of the flag poles? It may seem a silly thing, but for me they need to be there and un-cropped.
Lee, does the image go any higher up, so you can include the tops of the flag poles? It may seem a silly thing, but for me they need to be there and un-cropped.
I thought that too Toni
More Sky? Not an issue Lee
Les
Very nice just as a matter if interest what lens did you use, I ask because you have done a very good job on the verticals
Hah, that's great Les, nicely done. In future for scenes like this, I'll need to either point the camera a little more upwards or stand further back.
Thank you Chris. I used the Sigma 16mm F1.4 on my Sony a6600 aps-c so effectively 24mm FF equivalent. Great wide angle lens for framing wide horizontal structures like this. I often have the issue of buildings looking like they're falling back. Not so much though when standing further away.
Well you have done a very good job, at first sight I thought you had used a TS-E
I thought that too Toni
More Sky? Not an issue Lee
Les
If you're able to keep the camera level on the horizontal and vertical axis AND fit the whole building in you don't need the shift function.
Stand back, crop wide off the bottom, or shoot portrait then crop square removing the bottom. Stitch a series of vertical shots together, try get to a position of elevation to avoid having to angle the camera up. Lots of fudges to use without a TSE although they are fantastic to have.
Surprised Sony haven't developed one.
Shot 3 = the one