I got GAS and I want a new Landscape lens

Messages
4,770
Name
Neil Williams
Edit My Images
No
What is the very very very BEST lens for landscape to screw onto a Nikon D800e????..........looked at the Zeiss 55mm 1.4 but the focal length is to narrow :(
 
Don't you already have a 12-24/2.8? Could have sworn you said that was in your kit bag in the past, I don't see you'd need anything more than that, it has a filter thread right?

Edit: no it doesn't take filters it seems, so I guess maybe I'd go for a 16-35/2.8 I'm sure Nikon has that in its range
 
Last edited:
I think you have the zoom trinity (14-24-70-200) so have a play at landscapes and see which length you like most then get a prime to suit.
 
You're getting well into the realm of diminishing returns here now. It's highly unlikely anyone would be able to tell a shot taken with your 14-24 from one taken with a 21mm Zeiss in a blind test, no matter how hard they tried if you take the shot carefully.
 
^this

As David implied, if you've already got the 14-24 then spending as much again on a lens that probably isn't any better is a bit pointless.

But if you've got the urge to spend some money, don't let us put you off!!

Yup.

I'd say that if you simply must have a new toy, and there's nothing wrong with that if you have the money, you could go for something different like a prime. Maybe the Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art? At narrow apertures there might be no improvement in real world images but it is by many accounts a nice lens.

I read that Sigma may be bringing out a very nice 24mm Art in the future so maybe wait and see?
 
^this

A comparison on ePHOTOzine between the two had the Nikon edging it, subjective though.

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/c...-2-8-lenses-are-put-to-the-test--review-11118

As David implied, if you've already got the 14-24 then spending as much again on a lens that probably isn't any better is a bit pointless.

But if you've got the urge to spend some money, don't let us put you off!!

Maybe I should just invest in the Lee 150 filter system for the 14/24 and be done with it and save myself 1000 quid:).......its just so so big
 
^this

A comparison on ePHOTOzine between the two had the Nikon edging it, subjective though.

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/c...-2-8-lenses-are-put-to-the-test--review-11118

As David implied, if you've already got the 14-24 then spending as much again on a lens that probably isn't any better is a bit pointless.

But if you've got the urge to spend some money, don't let us put you off!!
Thanks for sharing the review Andy............kind of strange not using a Nikon body for the test but like I said above it might be wise to just invest in a filter system for the 14/24. Got anothe 5 days before I get off the rig so time to ponder on the best options
 
I also thought it odd to use a Canon, but I believe it's not uncommon as there is no equivalent in the canon line up.
I guess if you're after something smaller than the 14-24, then the Zeiss does make a lot of sense if you don't mind the manual focus. Otherwise there's the Nikon 24mm which is a bit longer and also rather expensive.
 
I also thought it odd to use a Canon, but I believe it's not uncommon as there is no equivalent in the canon line up.
I guess if you're after something smaller than the 14-24, then the Zeiss does make a lot of sense if you don't mind the manual focus. Otherwise there's the Nikon 24mm which is a bit longer and also rather expensive.
I have the 24mm already and love that lens but like you say its a wee bitty long for Scottish Highlands coastal shots. Not sure if the Zeiss 21mm will work on my Leica M........need to check that out
 
The Zeiss 15mm f/2.8, Zeiss 21mm or Zeiss 25mm f/2 are the three I'd pick from if you absolutely have to buy a lens. The Zeiss Otus can be used if you stitch it but stopping it down is killing a lot of what makes it special. If I were you get good filters for the 14-24 they can be as important as the lens.
 
What is the very very very BEST lens for landscape to screw onto a Nikon D800e????..........looked at the Zeiss 55mm 1.4 but the focal length is to narrow :(

Probably a tilt-shift is the ultimate landscape lens, eg 24mm PC Nikkor for depth-of-field control, perspective correction, and distortion-free stitched panoramas. Best on a tripod. Extremely sharp, and knowing your affection for quality gear, I think you'd love playing with one of these ;)

Not used the Nikon, but the Canon 24mm T&S gives something like a 12mm lens field-of-view with stitched panoramas.
 
Probably a tilt-shift is the ultimate landscape lens, eg 24mm PC Nikkor for depth-of-field control, perspective correction, and distortion-free stitched panoramas.

Good call Richard - another vote for a TS lens.
But beware ...... this may open the 'Quality' door to Large Format image making
 
I've got the Nikon 24 PC-E and the axis needs changed for landscape. You can risk it and do it yourself or send it to a Nikon repair centre and it costs about £70. It's a lens that requires careful use and has a steep learning curve. The Zeiss 21 is my trusty landscape lens although a 14-24 vs 21 Zeiss and you would be hard pressed to tell the difference if both were stopped down.
 
Probably a tilt-shift is the ultimate landscape lens, eg 24mm PC Nikkor for depth-of-field control, perspective correction, and distortion-free stitched panoramas. Best on a tripod. Extremely sharp, and knowing your affection for quality gear, I think you'd love playing with one of these ;)

Not used the Nikon, but the Canon 24mm T&S gives something like a 12mm lens field-of-view with stitched panoramas.
Just told my dealer to get me one................now comes the youtue and google learning curve
 
Back
Top