- Messages
- 5,022
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- No
Difference is those items are not designed to be used as a weapon.Incorrect use of anything is dangerous from a motor cycle to a frying pan.
Result, the same.Difference is those items are not designed to be used as a weapon.
No, I can reason why I own a bike or a pan . I only want a gun to shoot things.Result, the same.
All candidates for this years Darwin award.!
Which reminds me, 2013's are in, and a very appropriate 3rd goes to..............................
Third Place
After stepping around a marked police patrol car parked at the front door,
a man walked into H&J Leather & Firearms intent on robbing the store.
The shop was full of customers and a uniformed officer was standing at the counter.
Upon seeing the officer, the would-be robber announced a hold-up and fired a few wild shots from a target pistol.
The officer and a clerk promptly returned fire, and several customers also drew their guns and fired.
The robber was pronounced dead at the scene by Paramedics.
Crime scene investigators located 47 expended cartridge cases in the shop.
The subsequent autopsy revealed 23 gunshot wounds.
Ballistics identified rounds from 7 different weapons. No one else was hurt.
"Accidents like that don't happen if the person is using a correct stance, and when not shooting the gun is unloaded, safety on, pointed away from people etc.
I think I might be one of the minority in the UK who isn't madly against guns."
Looks like there are 2 of us in favour of guns here.
I think I might be one of the minority in the UK who isn't madly against guns."
Looks like there are 2 of us in favour of guns here.
I'm all in favour of guns but only responsibly. I work with guns daily and own several myself ranging from a simple shot gun to a .338 rifle designed and built in Finland for special forces.
.
I used to shoot regularly and owned a few handguns and load my own ammo too, before the ban.
'S&W .357 magnum colt .45 (ACP) and a Tangfolio 9mm.
To the "anti's" I would say, my guns were in a secure safe, while I was at work.
And never once did they get out and shoot anyone.
LOL MattGod the hammer of doom somehow feels less of a worry now
LOL Matt
Mine are all kept in a safe in a locked room that not even my wife has keys for. They only ever come out for work or long range target practice now and again. I also make my own ammo but the wife is a bit wary of my doing that in our house. My boss is on about making a separate building for ammo storage on the estate. A better idea really in case my self or any of the other keepers on the estate have a house fire, all the ammo is kept out of our houses then. It's always a worry with my two young kids about.I used to shoot regularly and owned a few handguns and load my own ammo too, before the ban.
'S&W .357 magnum colt .45 (ACP) and a Tangfolio 9mm.
To the "anti's" I would say, my guns were in a secure safe, while I was at work.
And never once did they get out and shoot anyone.
Yeah good idea.all the ammo is kept out of our houses then. It's always a worry with my two young kids about.
Yeah good idea.
I but I thought the gun or ammo safes were supposed to be fire proof?
TBH its been years. (1995? IIRC)
I just have the shot guns now.
Ah an ulterior motiveIt will be better when the whole lot is away from the houses and I can turn the room into a man cave
Ah an ulterior motive
Good man
I wouldn't say that too loud or the other's may well want to share your "man cave"Lol it was the boss that suggested it. Out of all the keepers on the estate I'm the only one with a spare room
Absolutely love it, kind of reminds me of the shoplifter that tripped down a kerb
Don't worry they already plan on having keys cut for my own houseI wouldn't say that too loud or the other's may well want to share your "man cave"
Guns handled by the military or the police are designed to be weapons. My own guns and rifles are not, they are designed and used for sport. Of course, just like my chess pieces and my table tennis bat, they CAN be used for weapons, but it's wrong to describe them as such.Difference is those items are not designed to be used as a weapon.
The fact that some rifles are designed to kill vermin doesn't make them weapons. They are weapons only if used for offensive purposes against people.Garry, rifles are designed to kill things, mine do.Sport is a secondary option mate.
I think we have the right idea in this country where you have to apply for a licence for a gun, giving a justification for owning it. The American system where you almost get a free gun in every packet of cornflakes is not something a civilised society should have.
Guns are o.k. for target shooting and killing vermin but are not a good idea for self defence.
Steve.
Unfortunately, the Firearms Act agrees with you and describes guns as weapons. And many police of course describe them as weapons too, usually in a perjorative sense, e.g. "When his car was stopped a weapon was found in the boot of the car and was seized".Gary. They were designed to kill first. Sport came after. It's not wrong to state a fact. The definition of a weapon is a thing designed or used for inflicting harm or physical damage. Does not matter what you shoot
In most states as long as you pass a background check then you're all good to go and you have to wait about 2weeks, correct me if I'm wrong.
All candidates for this years Darwin award.!
Crime scene investigators located 47 expended cartridge cases in the shop.
The subsequent autopsy revealed 23 gunshot wounds.
I think it varies from sate to state but it's irrelevant really as there are so many guns owned by the American public that if you wanted one, you could get one easily. I'm sure there are no background checks for private sales of secondhand guns... or if there are, they probably get ignored.
Half right. For a weapon that requires a Firearms Certificate, you're completely correct.I think we have the right idea in this country where you have to apply for a licence for a gun, giving a justification for owning it.