I quite like Tri-X pushed to 800 - I like grain and contrast, and 800 ISO helps in the increasingly low light of Autumn.
However, until I start processing at home, I don't like the increasing costs of traditional B&W development.
Which is where XP2 / Neopan 400CN come in. I like the idea of the exposure flexibilty from shot to shot, and Ilford state they're good up to 800 ISO. The internets consensus however seems to be not go further than 400 ? Anyone have experience shooting these at 800 in low light, and/or have some example shots they could show ?
However, until I start processing at home, I don't like the increasing costs of traditional B&W development.
Which is where XP2 / Neopan 400CN come in. I like the idea of the exposure flexibilty from shot to shot, and Ilford state they're good up to 800 ISO. The internets consensus however seems to be not go further than 400 ? Anyone have experience shooting these at 800 in low light, and/or have some example shots they could show ?