- Messages
- 23
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- No
I am looking for some advice, just for the sake of knowing the facts for future.
Sunday when I turned up at an U16’s Cup final, that I was asked to do by the Manager.
A club ‘official’ for the team I was asked to take photos for, stopped me on arrival, and advised that I wasn’t permitted to take photographs, as I required permission from both teams to comply with child protection laws. I disagreed with him.
Now, my understanding is that I can turn up at any football game for any age, and take photographs WITHOUT permissions of any of the teams, this is on the basis that it is on public land i.e Council owned pitch, unless the Council, had some bylaw against it.
The only difference with this occasion was that instead of normal local playing fields, is that teams had hired a Junior club venue for the final. Now in my mind the only restriction that could be imposed would be by the ground owners, and only because it is private land, and they can impose any restrictions they see fit.
Does anyone know what the true legal stance on this is?
Apologies if this has been discussed previously, but I searched and couldn't find it.
Many Thanks.
Sunday when I turned up at an U16’s Cup final, that I was asked to do by the Manager.
A club ‘official’ for the team I was asked to take photos for, stopped me on arrival, and advised that I wasn’t permitted to take photographs, as I required permission from both teams to comply with child protection laws. I disagreed with him.
Now, my understanding is that I can turn up at any football game for any age, and take photographs WITHOUT permissions of any of the teams, this is on the basis that it is on public land i.e Council owned pitch, unless the Council, had some bylaw against it.
The only difference with this occasion was that instead of normal local playing fields, is that teams had hired a Junior club venue for the final. Now in my mind the only restriction that could be imposed would be by the ground owners, and only because it is private land, and they can impose any restrictions they see fit.
Does anyone know what the true legal stance on this is?
Apologies if this has been discussed previously, but I searched and couldn't find it.
Many Thanks.