- Messages
- 141
- Name
- Adrian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Looks a lot like Weymouth going by the building with the domes and the church spire.
Looks a lot like Weymouth going by the building with the domes and the church spire.
Looks a lot like Weymouth going by the building with the domes and the church spire.
excalibur2 said:it's Agfacolor slide
Shorpy have just put another update of 5x4 Kodachromes in their collection.
Maybe if we all were to really get behind the new Ferriana (sic) transparency film next year it will be a big hint to kodak that there is a market for it. I personally have never shot Kodachrome but I know if it came back I would happily pay £20 per film as long as it was process paid! Was Kodachrome always process included anyway or am I thinking of another film?
I still have an unexposed roll of Kodachrome. Expired in 1996 I think. I'd love to have a go with it but I never got round to it before the included developing wasn't available any more. Fairly certain it was always process paid as it is so complicated compared to other emulsions.
Maybe if we all were to really get behind the new Ferriana (sic) transparency film next year it will be a big hint to kodak that there is a market for it.
I personally have never shot Kodachrome but I know if it came back I would happily pay £20 per film as long as it was process paid! Was Kodachrome always process included anyway or am I thinking of another film?
Was Kodachrome always process included anyway or am I thinking of another film?
I bought a 35mm camera just so I could shoot some before it went under.
I didn't realise at the time quite what was being discontinued.
So I've got 3 rolls that went to Dwaynes in the US, as I understand it there were only 2 labs on Earth that processed Kodachrome, one in the US and one in Switzerland, so unless you were really lucky to live close to a lab, it was a send off job for everybody and thus process paid at purchase.
Shorpy have just put another update of 5x4 Kodachromes in their collection.
I've not seen these before.
http://www.shorpy.com/Large_Format_Kodachromes
I'm over being irritated that kodachrome no longer exists, but looking at these pictures you start to get an inkling of how much of a complete epic tragedy it actually is.
.
I still have an unexposed roll of Kodachrome. Expired in 1996 I think. I'd love to have a go with it but I never got round to it before the included developing wasn't available any more. Fairly certain it was always process paid as it is so complicated compared to other emulsions.
Non Standard Film
We can also process 127, 126, 110 and a selection of obselete film including Kodachrome and C-22.
Please call [...]
E6 Process for Colour Transparency Films
We process all makes of 35mm, 120 and 5x4 E6 process colour transparency film (except Kodachrome - a process paid film that must be processed by Kodak).
Suz, I believe Kodachrome can be processed as black and white even today; I've seen the instructions somewhere (maybe on this very forum?). BTW Peak have two contradictory comments on their website (emphasis added):
I bought a 35mm camera just so I could shoot some before it went under.
I didn't realise at the time quite what was being discontinued.
So I've got 3 rolls that went to Dwaynes in the US, as I understand it there were only 2 labs on Earth that processed Kodachrome, one in the US and one in Switzerland, so unless you were really lucky to live close to a lab, it was a send off job for everybody and thus process paid at purchase.
joxby said:You not been in Bradford tonight ??
Nope, had a gig in Watford but noticed something was happening! What was it?
joxby said:They did get some proper sound techs in for this though, Pro Audio