Laptop! Samsung?

Looks good to me....I'm Looking for a new laptop to...looking at a Mac Book, have you ever considered a Mac?
 
Budget?
 
I have a 17 inch Samsung, R730 a slower cheaper model than that one. It works well and feels solid, I'd have no problems recomending Samsung as a brand.
 
Been a sony vaio person for a long time now, when I broke the screen on my last one, yep dropped it, I bought a different make and regretted it.
My vaio was very robust and never gave me a days proiblem, it was repaired and I sold it, as far as I know it's still working fine.
I conceded when the new laptop went wrong after 3 months and popped into my local sony shop to see what they had and found they were running a 25% sale, so got another vaio and it's great
Trouble is the other one was repaired under guarantee and now sits in a box on top of the wardrobe, did I say I hate it ;)
 
Budget it around £500-£600 i think.

Gremlin you have just persuaded me to stick with Sony that is the 1 fear i had about buying another make. The Vaios as far as laptops go are pretty bomb proof imo.

I have considered a Mac Cata kid but i just don't see the point in paying 3 times as much for a little apple that lights up.
 
I'm not certain how Intel work it
Generally, the higher the number, the more cores/threads and more cache it will have. On a single threaded app (e.g. mp3 encode) the higher clock speed will win out, but on anything like photoshop/lightroom that has multiple threads, more but slower processors do it better.

The reason they have a lower clock speed on more processors on a laptop is to manage the heat being produced.
 

http://www.laptopsdirect.co.uk/Sony_VAIO_F13_Core_i7_Laptop_VPCF13M0EB/version.asp?PID=1711

Processor Clock Speed
1730 MHz

To me that seems a bit low? The laptop will be used for the odd game.

To put some numbers on this (which isn't always the best thing to do, but I'll do it anyway ;))

The first is a core i3-380M running at 2.53GHz, the second an i7-740QM at 1.73GHz.

The i3 has 2 cores with hyperthreading (which means each core can run 2 things at once) for a total of 4 threads at 2.53GHz.

The i7 has 4 cores with hyperthreading for a total of 8 threads at 1.73GHz.

Doing some totally bogus (but illustrative) maths, that means the i3 has a "power" of 4 x 2.53 or about 10, the i7 has a "power" of 8 x 1.73 or about 14, so even though the processor is clocked lower, there is 40% more processing power available (actually, there will be more as the i7 has a bigger cache which helps it go a tad faster again for most things).

The story doesn't end there. If the i7 isn't using all its cores, it can use turbo to overclock cores. It does this so that whilst idling, it isn't pulling lots of power. The 740QM has turbo ratios of 1/1/6/9 which means this is the overclock depending on whether 4/3/2/1 core(s) are run. Let's take the equivalent of the i3 with 2 cores running flat out. We can add 6 x 133MHz to the 2 core clock speed giving 2 cores operating at 2.53GHz which is the same as the i3. Even better, when only a single core is flat out (e.g. mp3 encoding), the adder is 9 x 133 which means you have a single core at 2.93GHz which is faster than the i3 on a single cored app.
 
Thanks for that arad!

i7 it is then. haha.

Im able to put this through work to get the vat off so do i raise mu budget or do i take the sensible approach.. hehe.
 
Back
Top