Well its all subjective but the first (right) looks a much better overall composition to me. There's so much dead space in the second photo. YMMV!
Errrm, the background you got confuses me (only two brain cells and neither seems to be functioning right now). Generally I would have said more space in the direction the subject is looking or moving towards to. Do consider portrait too
The first one, but flip it.
Upside down?Then, the OP question will be: RIGHT or LEFT!
My PP knowledge only goes as far as adjusting the exposure ... the bird seems a bit underexposed. Over to you.
I prefer the bird looking into the frame and with these i find the solid block of blue fighting for my attention.
Yes, it was badly underexposed, and I've added as much exposure as I can with highlights right down at the bottom. Anymore and I'd blow out the background.
Yes it would make the background even whiter, that is why I suggested portrait. Cut the blue out completely ... see if it works on white only. The blue distracts and does not add anything.
Do you think I know Let me play (at least I had the coffee).I've upped the exposure more, and cut most of the blue out. Should I get rid of all of the blue?
I've upped the exposure more, and cut most of the blue out. Should I get rid of all of the blue?
I hear you!! Maybe unnatural colour is not the way to go with birds
Main reason, weight. My packed bag with D750 was 2 stone. I have to take everything...I know, I know, I don't have to take everything. I just always have.
Appreciate the feedback
I thought I would have included half the blue you got but then I ended up with a square image. I see the background rather gray so it might take some more exposure (I have not tried as what I got won't play). Here is what I come up with given the background you got:
View attachment 106661